On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Terrence Brannon wrote: > >> But removing the #include still leads to a failed parse even though >> the program is syntactically valid without it. > > That's because the demo itself is broken. (It was unintentionally > added to the distribution).
Will the demo in question be fixed, replaced, or removed? I think it's a useful one. Ted
