Paul,

Thanks for your 2 cents worth.

It's not so much there is anything wrong with a party, but why settle for a
fool's paradise when there is an alternative? Party on by all means.

I don't know what the future condition would be. It is less than even a
blur to me. There is no guarantee for this one. No money back refund
if not satisfied. Creating the future-now is a bit like that. Total
commitment
is required without any possibly guarantee that it is not going to blow up
in your face.

It is an act of faith on my part that it would be any better if we could
incorporate some wisdon from First Peoples Way(s) into our lives. My 
faith is not without its reasons or its basis, but ultimately that it is
what
it comes down to - and act of faith.

I was going to say that acts of faith may pose a problem for those who
subscribe to secularism - but even there there is so much which rests 
on acts of faith day in and day out as to make me realise that secularism
itself is a form of, well, if not quite religion, a form of something and
not
reality stripped naked of all pretensions. Nonsense on stilts, more like
it.

We talking metaphysics, mate, not physics. Talking about the unconscious
in culture. Taling about how our minds and lives are subject to the
controls
of others, without us knowing about it. Call it the cultural master
narratives
if you like and their role in rendering us captive.

Just who are we? 

I can't say that i have any real idea of First Peoples  thinking on
questions of
sexuality and gender issues (rarely discussed with outsiders in my limited
experience).  But i doubt if they would be of the kind which seeks to
imprison within the body a life force which was special. From what i have
seen, difference from the norm is evaluated according to the contribution
this adds to life, and the degree to which those who are in this position
respect certain values.

There is a greater likelihood that there is a place in life for members of
your community within a Way informed by the wisdom of First Peoples than it
is (in my opinion) when this present system experiences the next round of
deep stress (which appears to be on the horizon) and looks for others to
blame for its own shortcomings.

But you are right to be cautious. Who knows what beast lurks below the
surface. Not me. Each step taken is a tentative one, watching for the known
traps - keen to avoid repeating them. Knowing full well that we will
probably 
invent a few news ones, but the alternative is not to move with life at
all. And
that is no life at all - a voluntary prisoner inside a poorly made cell.

Why is it that others wish to confine us in these containers? Why do they
seek
to imprison us within the latest experiment in "leak proof" vessels?

For my part, i can only say that Angel-Beings may come in all shapes and
forms for all i know. I am opposed to clipping the wings and locking in
cages creatures of the air.

I can see i'm on a real winner (NOT!) with my attempts to draw attention to
the dangers of secularism.

I will restrict my further response to completing the piece on
transubstantiation, and then leave you all in peace as i return to the
songlines (from whence i seem to have been drawn back here in Recoznet,
despite my good intentions).


Bruce
7 March






Paul wrote:

this individual freedom has allowed my community to flourish. the reduction
in the power of the church over the state has been essential to this. I
would
like to know before it is replaced what new 'vision' awaits me and my
community.
this explanation is not offered, just a blur. why wouldn't I worry that
life
would get worse? what changes in systems haven't resulted in imprisonment,
death
and brutality for our mob? (communism being an obvious example) how are
your
ideas
any better?
and what is wrong with a party? what is wrong with burning off energy?
perhaps I'm misreading you here bruce but this sounds a little wowserish.
to 

----------
> From: Paul Canning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [recoznet2] the state is not secular
> Date: Saturday, 6 March 1999 15:05

-------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

Reply via email to