-----Original Message-----
From: Trudy Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: news-clip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, March 06, 1999 9:38 AM
Subject: SMH - PM rejects black compromise


PM rejects black compromise

Date: 06/03/99

By MARGO KINGSTON in Canberra

The Prime Minister yesterday rejected a compromise form of apology to the
stolen generations suggested by his Council for Aboriginal
Reconciliation and cast doubts on whether he could meet his pledge to
oversee reconciliation by 2001.

His rejection has rocked the council, which sent him a draft of its proposed
document of reconciliation this week ahead of public
consultations. It included a heavily qualified general apology to Aboriginal
people for past injustices designed to accommodate Mr
Howard's refusal to budge on an apology.

The draft states: "We hereby take this step: as one part of the nation
expresses its sorrow and profoundly regrets the injustices of the
past, so the other part accepts the apology and forgives." The wording was
designed to give Mr Howard a way out of his refusal to
apologise officially to the stolen generations by putting the word "apology"
in the mouths of indigenous Australians.

But after the draft document was leaked on Thursday, Mr Howard said he had
already rejected some points by letter and would not
countenance any apology. Mr Howard also appeared less confident that he
could achieve his commitment made on election night last
year to achieve reconciliation by 2001.

Mr Howard said in a radio interview that he had written to the council
saying that "there are some things in all of the documents that we
can't possibly agree to".

"I want to be positive. I would like to try and have a document of
reconciliation. I don't know whether it can be achieved and I hope the
debate does not get bogged down entirely on this issue of whether the
present generation assumes responsibility for the claimed misdeeds
of earlier generations."

Council sources said an apology in some form was "pivotal" to Aboriginal
participation in reconciliation, and that the compromise form of
words was "the absolute bottom line". On election night last year, Mr Howard
said: "I also want to commit myself very genuinely to the
cause of true reconciliation with the Aboriginal people of Australia by the
centenary of Federation." The next month he met the council
and said there was "goodwill on the part of the Government" to achieve
adocument of reconciliation by May 2000.

The then Labor government and the Opposition unanimously agreed to establish
the council in 1991 with the task of producing a
document of reconciliation by the end of the century. But bipartisanship on
reconciliation collapsed. Hopes for its revival rested on Mr
Howard's election night commitment to the cause.

The Opposition spokesman on Aboriginal affairs, Mr Daryl Melham, said the
council's compromise "was designed to find an honourable
way through the impasse for everyone".

"This is not just John Howard, this is John Howard Prime Minister, and he is
the one who is diminished by this."

The chairman of ATSIC, Mr Gatjil Djerrkura, said last night: "I think it is
fair to say relations between the current Federal Government
and the Aboriginal peoples of this country have never been worse."

In my opinion, this is because Aboriginal People and their supporters are
continually giving ground to Howard in a vain attempt to achieve
"Reconciliation" on grounds acceptable to Howard.

HOWARD WILL NOT BE SATISFIED UNLESS ABORIGINAL AUSTRALIANS FORFEIT ALL
RIGHTS TO HIS "MAINSTREAM AUSTRALIA".

HOWARD MUST BE TREATED AS AN UNCOMPROMISING AND FANATIC ENEMY, OR ALL
CHANCES OF JUSTICE FOR OUR FIRST PEOPLES WILL BE LOST FOR GENERATIONS, IF
NOT FOREVER.

We must recognize the enemy before we can defeat him.

Laurie


Laurie and Desley Forde   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



This material is subject to copyright and any unauthorised use, copying or
mirroring is prohibited.


*************************************************************************
This posting is provided to the individual members of this  group without
permission from the copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment,
scholarship and research under the "fair use" provisions of the Federal
copyright laws and it may not be distributed further without permission of
the copyright owner, except for "fair use."




-------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

Reply via email to