Monday, February 15, 1999

Tent embassy protest flares again

Aboriginal tent embassy protesters today lit another fire on the
lawns outside New Parliament House after federal Reconciliation
Minister Philip Ruddock cancelled a meeting with the group.

The protesters moved back up the hill from Old Parliament
House this morning after Mr Ruddock cancelled the meeting,
saying it had become a publicity stunt.

They rejected an offer to meet Mr Ruddock in his office, saying
there would be no meeting in Parliament House.

"We want to meet with them on neutral ground," said embassy
spokesman Michael Anderson.

"We should not be forced into and we won't be forced into
meeting with their terms. We're not about compromising. If they
want us to compromise then they have to meet us halfway."

A spokesman for Mr Ruddock said the decision to scrap the
meeting was taken last Friday on the grounds that it was going to
become nothing more than a publicity event.

The protest began outside New Parliament House last week
following speculation the Government was considering moving
the tent embassy from its site opposite Old Parliament House.

The protesters agreed to move back down the hill last Friday after
senior Liberal Senator Bill Heffernan personally arranged for the
return of 211 ceremonial spears confiscated by police on
Wednesday night.

Police also extinguished a ceremonial fire lit on the lawns.

Senator Heffernan met embassy representatives today and was
handed a submission for Prime Minister John Howard. - AAP

 This material is subject to copyright and any unauthorised use, copying
or mirroring is

-------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."



Reply via email to