ABC TV The 7:30 Report
 Transcript
 20/04/00
 NT Chief Magistrate in trouble
 over juvenile hearing

 MAXINE McKEW: The job of NT Chief Magistrate
 Hugh Bradley is in jeopardy after a case went
 against him in the Supreme Court yesterday.

 Mr Bradley was being challenged because he had
 refused to disqualify himself from hearing a
 juvenile matter.

 The Supreme Court prohibited him from
 continuing and said it was arguable a case of
 perceived bias could be made against him.

 The court cited the circumstances in which the
 Chief Magistrate's salary package, far more
 lucrative than that of his predecessor, had been
 negotiated in secret with the Territory
 Government.

 The Chief Magistrate's appointment followed the
 introduction of the NT's controversial mandatory
 sentencing laws and, unlike some other
 magistrates, Mr Bradley has not been a public
 critic of the laws.

 Murray McLaughlin reports.

 MURRAY McLAUGHLIN: Aboriginal Legal Aid
 lawyer Michael Jones had long been troubled by
 remarks from the bench of NT Chief Magistrate
 Hugh Bradley -- like when Mr Bradley was
 required to jail for a year a third-time property
 offender for stealing a towel: "You've been to
 court many times before.

 It may be that it's a person such as you that the
 mandatory sentencing law was enacted (sic) -- 

 It is the constant disregard for the property of
 others which has resulted in the government
 taking the action it has with regard to mandatory
 imprisonment."

 MICHAEL JONES, NORTH AUSTRALIA
 ABORIGINAL LEGAL AID SERVICE: On regular
 occasions he made very, very strange decisions,
 made very, very weird statements in court that
 effectively aligned himself, in my view, to the CLP
 Government policy.

 I started to collect transcripts of these court
 proceedings because I was very worried that my
 clients were possibly not getting a fair hearing.

 MURRAY McLAUGHLIN: Then, five weeks ago, this
 program revealed that Mr Bradley had secured a
 secret and special pay deal when he was
 appointed Chief Magistrate by then
 Attorney-General Shane Stone in early 1998.

 The implications of the deal would draw criticism
 from the Law Council, the nation's peak law
 body, from judicial groups and from all the
 full-time judges of the NT Supreme Court.

 RICHARD ACKLAND, LEGAL JOURNALIST: As far
 as I'm aware, it's unprecedented for a judicial
 officer, let alone a chief magistrate, to enter into
 a secret pay deal with the government of the
 day.

 This was a pay deal that was over and above the
 normal terms and conditions set by the
 Remuneration Tribunal for the Chief Magistrate in
 the Territory.

 So, in other words, it involved a hands-on,
 almost face-to-face negotiation with the
 government of the day that appointed him.

 MURRAY McLAUGHLIN: Revelations at the pay
 deal gave Michael Jones a cue to move against Mr
 Bradley.

 MICHAEL JONES: That particular '7:30 Report'
 contained material that really stimulated my
 concern about the deal -- what was the deal?

 MURRAY McLAUGHLIN: Secrecy surrounding the
 deal became the basis of an application by
 Michael Jones to have Chief Magistrate Bradley
 disqualify himself from a juvenile case late last
 month because of perceptions of bias.

 MICHAEL JONES: She was a 15-year-old girl who
 was charged with a very serious property offence
 and I advised her that, in my view, on this day
 her liberty was at stake -- she might go to Don
 Dale because of Mr Bradley's perceived bias.

 MURRAY McLAUGHLIN: Mr Bradley declined to
 disqualify himself and so unravelled the action
 which had its denouement in the Supreme Court
 at Darwin yesterday.

 Mr Justice Olney found that, prima facie, the
 manner of Mr Bradley's appointment, particularly
 his pay deal, could give rise to a perception that
 he could be compromised and, on the suggestion
 of Mr Bradley's own lawyer, Justice Olney
 prohibited the Chief Magistrate from continuing
 to sit on the juvenile case in question.

 MICHAEL JONES: Everything upon which our
 society is built concerns the independence of
 judges and magistrates to fearlessly interpret
 the law and apply it without looking over their
 shoulders at governments of the day barking out
 some particular policy.

 MURRAY McLAUGHLIN: The collapse of the action
 yesterday means that the Aboriginal Legal Aid
 team still has not got access to the paperwork
 which established Mr Bradley's contract.

 The contract expired last month and the
 Government says Mr Bradley's employment has
 now been regularised.

 DENIS BURKE, NT CHIEF MINISTER: Well, it was
 an arrangement that was put in place by the
 previous chief minister.

 I inherited the arrangement.

 To my mind, there's nothing untoward in the
 arrangement, simply that from a perception point
 of view.

 I don't believe in fixed terms for chief
 magistrates.

 He was employed on a fixed term.

 That has now expired and he will be employed on
 an open term with a package, as recommended.

 MURRAY McLAUGHLIN: Steve Southwood was
 Law Society president early last year when he got
 wind that Mr Bradley's appointment might be
 irregular.

 He met Mr Bradley and was assured that
 everything was aboveboard.

 STEVE SOUTHWOOD, PAST PRESIDENT, NT LAW
 SOCIETY: What I wasn't told by him,
 fundamentally, was that his salary and
 remuneration arrangements as at the time of his
 appointment had only been, in effect, set for two
 years, not over the full term of his appointment,
 and that was contrary to my understanding
 when I left the meeting with him.

 MURRAY McLAUGHLIN: Yet Mr Bradley said in
 court last month that his appointment was not
 for a limited term, that he was appointed and
 remunerated in the ordinary way, that talk of a
 secret package was untrue.

 In the Supreme Court yesterday, Michael Maurice
 QC, leading the case against Mr Bradley, said the
 Chief Magistrate had shown almost complete lack
 of candour about the circumstances of his
 appointment and had made misleading and
 deceptive statements about them from his
 bench.

 John Reeves QC, for Mr Bradley, said allegations
 which amounted to a substantial attack on his
 client were rejected and without foundation.

 But the end of the court action yesterday is not
 the end of trouble for Mr Bradley.

 STEVE SOUTHWOOD: I think Mr Bradley has a
 responsibility to his fellow magistrates to ensure
 that there is full and frank disclosure provided
 because, unfortunately, any opprobrium which
 continues to be attached to his appointment
 does reflect on them, he being a member of their
 court.

 And that's most unfortunate.

 MICHAEL JONES: The upshot is that Mr Bradley
 is now harpooned.

 His integrity is without doubt in the balance.

 It is questionable.

 We still do not know what the deal was.

 We still do not know what the deal is, or what it
 might be.

 It still has the appearance of a
 performance-based package.

 MURRAY McLAUGHLIN: The fallout continues
 seriously to affect the administration of justice in
 the NT.

 Michael Jones and other solicitors at the North
 Australia Aboriginal Legal Aid Service will be
 moving for Mr Bradley to disqualify himself every
 time one of their clients appears before him.

 And the Legal Service late today lodged another
 application to the Supreme Court -- this time to
 have Mr Bradley's appointment declared invalid
 on the ground that it was made for an ulterior
 purpose.

 MAXINE McKEW: The NT Chief Minister and
 Attorney-General, Mr Denis Burke, would not
 comment today, citing the fact that he has yet to
 be briefed on Mr Bradley's position.

 Equally, our call to Mr Bradley for comment was
 referred to his solicitor, who did not respond.

 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  � 2000 Australian Broadcasting Corporation
------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ 
http://www.mail-archive.com/recoznet2%40paradigm4.com.au/

Reply via email to