I am forwarding this for Bruce...Trudy


Date sent:              Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:19:48 +1000
Subject:                Australia - now empowering male dictators
Send reply to:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]



PATRIARCHY'S LAST HURRAH!

It is no secret that the election of the Howard Federal government 
in 1996 represented the return to power of yesterday's men.

The two sad clowns who pass themselves off as the Australian 
Federal Attorney-General and the Minister for Foreign Affairs have 
played their role in empowering dictators around the world with the 
announcement the Australia has sided with governments which 
wish to maintain their rule by foul means.

But they are merely dancing puppets for other puppet masters who 
stay well out of the light of the democratic system.

Not surprisingly, Northern Territory Chief Minister Denis Burke was 
quick off the mark saying that this attack on the international 
means for encouraging and protecting the hard won human rights 
culture justified his stance.

His stance being one he inherited from Shane Stone (now 
President of the Federal Liberal Party) and which makes much of 
the claim to legitimacy bestowed by the workings of the 
democratic electoral system. 

Denis Burke makes much of the fact that the types of concerns 
which are taken to UN human rights committees would have 'no 
electoral appeal'.

A more sober interpretation of the Northern Territory is not that it is 
a viable democracy but rather a one party dictatorship based on 
race and corruption. The Northern Territory of Australia, as 
Aboriginal women well know, is a blokey place where unrelated 
men behave very badly. 

The means by which the highly unrespectable can coat their bad 
behaviour in blokey respectability is made possible by the failed 
experiment in democracy in the Commonwealth's Northern Territory.

Similar male dominated governments around the world are likely to 
agree with Burke. But the Commonwealth government refuses to 
accept its responsibilities to attain best - not worst - practice in its 
northern territory.

With a Federal Liberal party which is at a great remove to the right 
of a true Liberal position, other forces dominate the Federal 
government through the party bosses. And they owe their primarily 
allegiance not to Liberal values but to seriously big money.

The same forces which attacked the Australian High Court when it 
'got the answer wrong' in recognising native title are now attacking 
the UN and for the same reasons.

Australia's genocidal record in relation to indigenous peoples has 
built up a mountain of vested interest from the proceeds of wrongful 
expropriation - and this process continues into the 21st century.

Anglo-Australia Inc seeks to consolidate its hold on Australia's 
wealth and if that requires it to jettison pretences of supporting 
international protection for human rights, then so be it. 

The present Australian government has now positioned itself at the 
forefront of an international attempt by those who find respect for 
human rights a nuisance for their other agendas.

Howard, like Burke, knows that indigenous rights issues have no 
electoral appeal domestically. They rank below number ten - a long 
way down the list from health, education, employment etc.

Until Australia's voters realise the great significance of ensuring the 
well-being of First Peoples, the Australian situation will remain 
unhealthy.

There may be some hope in that the announcement of the Howard 
government's position regarding domestic and international human 
rights comes at the time when some ten thousand overseas media 
people are arriving in the country for the Olympic Games.

The Australian government's position will be far better known than it 
would normally be. And successive Australian governments have 
got away with so much over the centuries by being remote and 
invisible to the outside world.

The true features of those who claim to represent life in Australia 
are now becoming recognisable - and the figures of life they call to 
mind may come as a shock to many who stand opposed to 
wrongheaded male dominated forms of totalitarianism.


Australia's Federal government has just weakened its domestic 
sexual discrimination legislation to empower State governments to 
deny the use of IVF processes to single women. Now it completes 
it move by refusing to adopt international means of protecting the 
rights of women.

Correcting the priorities of Australia's voting public will require 
assistance from others outside of Australia to send healing 
messages to Australia's government in an international language 
they understand.

Get well soon, Australia, for all your produce must now be viewed 
as tainted by half the world's population - that of the women whose 
rights you have just refused to uphold and support. Surely, say 
people overseas, our mother will not cook with anything made in 
Australia.

Women, as the Australian male dominated Australian governments 
seems to have forgotten, represent Mother Earth herself. Healing 
life in Australia requires the full support of all those who love - and 
seek to protect from abuse - their mother,  their sisters, their 
daughters and their wives.

Bruce Reyburn
30 August 2000
------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ 
http://www.mail-archive.com/recoznet2%40paradigm4.com.au/

Reply via email to