Alexander Farber wrote:
> PS: Don't want to annoy anyone here, but to me
> as a JAVA/XML illiterate and maybe even a hater
> this Spring-stuff just feels so wrong: instead of
> using one plain text file for configuration, you
> have to spend days to debug this XML-junk and
> even once you sort it out, it is still counter-intuitive:
Spring does use properties files for external variables. Spring even
have special bean type for it:
<bean id="placeholderConfig"
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer">
<property name="location" value="classpath:/red5.properties" />
</bean>
This one was taken from red5-core.xml app context file which is used by
Red5 core application.
If you found Spring counter-intuitive, you may give it up and create
your own IoC container or develop Pico-based Red5. But every IoC
container I know uses XML because... well, you just won't believe me.
If I were you I would just read Spring reference up to 4th chapter. Many
things suddenly will become clear and obvious. Don't blame tool if you
can't use it. Probably the reason is you.
--
Michael "Antares" Klishin,
novemberain.com | osflash.org/red5 | rubyonrails.ru | flex.org
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
