Hank,

I really appreciate you spearheading this documentation project.
Someone needed to kick us in the ass to do it. You've also been very
specific about what would help; obviously that's a huge step. If you
don't know what kind of documentation to make, then it's going to be a
very long process.

Thanks again,
Chris

On 11/8/06, hank williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I totally agree.
>
> hank
>
> On 11/8/06, Marek Zoth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I believe you can use wiki and still find volunteers for some sections
> > and assign responsibilities for sections to people personally. But the
> > wiki should be the place where the pieces come together, bugs are fixed
> > right away when someone spot them and common formatting / style of docs
> > is used.
> >
> > ~M~
> >
> > hank williams wrote:
> > > I think wiki's are great, and it should be used, but the issue is
> > > structure. I fear that by saying "oh, the doc will just be in a wiki
> > > that anyone can contribute to" that there is less a sense that there
> > > needs to be some really well written well considered stuff. Its like
> > > if you send an email to ten cc'd people, no one will respond, but if
> > > you send an email to just one person they more probably will.
> > >
> > > The point is that I really am advocating a very specific documentation
> > > project that could be parcelled out to a few people. This could be put
> > > on a wiki, and in a pdf, and in a swf as well. The most important
> > > issue is something really good to get people started.
> > >
> > > So I guess what I am saying is it would be great if a few people could
> > > agree on compartmentalizing and attacking small pieces of getting
> > > started. I know people are busy so I suggest a minimal starting
> > > framework. Just something to get dummies like me started!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Hank
> > >
> > > On 11/8/06, John Grden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> well, we have the wiki on OSFlash.org, so might as well put that to good 
> > >> use
> > >> yes?
> > >>
> > >> Shall I start some pages for intro sake?  I mean, a page that has a list
> > >> (TOC) of how too's etc that the community can add and participate in
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 11/8/06, Marek Zoth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I recommend to use some wiki system for documentation creation so that
> > >>>
> > >> more people from the community could contribute to it directly. 
> > >> Developers
> > >> then spend much less time with docs.
> > >>
> > >>> ~M~
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Storm wrote:
> > >>> I second the need of some documentation /sample explanation. You guys 
> > >>> are
> > >>>
> > >> doing a great job on this project and this issue is the only thing i find
> > >> lagging. It's not a complain, but a way to colaborate now you know that 
> > >> Red5
> > >> is getting users that demand some more docs :). I'm hard when it comes to
> > >> leave things half-done so once i started researching Red5 i didn't give 
> > >> up
> > >> and i'm doing what i can with what i have, but perhaps many potential 
> > >> users
> > >> are passing by for that reason.
> > >>
> > >>> That been said, i'll read anything you release, so you've got other "doc
> > >>>
> > >> debugger" ;)
> > >>
> > >>> Cheers
> > >>> Storm
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 11/8/06, Dominick Accattato <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hank, I think we all know what needs to be done.  Its difficult when we
> > >>>>
> > >> hear it because its painfully obvious, but the lack of simple 
> > >> documentation
> > >> is troublesome.  I don't want to commit myself to anything, but I'll try 
> > >> and
> > >> get a few pages together.
> > >>
> > >>>> Here was a quick mock up I did back during 0.3, but I never actually 
> > >>>> put
> > >>>>
> > >> much into completing sections.
> > >>
> > >>>>
> > >> http://www.newviewnetworks.com/nvnhome/blog/client/media/Red5%20Manual%200.3.swf
> > >>
> > >>>> On 11/8/06, hank williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On 11/8/06, John Grden < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> creating a new app with the new API:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >> http://www.joachim-bauch.de/tutorials/red5/HOWTO-NewApplications.txt
> > >>
> > >>>>>> Migration guide:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >> http://www.joachim-bauch.de/tutorials/red5/MigrationGuide.txt
> > >>
> > >>>>>> API online:
> > >>>>>> http://dl.fancycode.com/red5/api/
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Does that help?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> Well, not really.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The first thing I wanted to do was run the demos. There is no getting
> > >>>>> started guided. Now, it took me 15 minutes to figure out that red5
> > >>>>> comes up on port 5080. Now I bet that is written down somewhere but I
> > >>>>> couldnt find it. There really should be a getting started guide that
> > >>>>> explains how to run the darned thing. Now I am a tomcat user, so I was
> > >>>>> able to look at the text stream from red5 and look for the port. But
> > >>>>> only someone who is in the tomcat/j2ee world will know how to do that.
> > >>>>> I bet many people wont get that far.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Now, I did look at joachim's new application guide. But its just too
> > >>>>> hard. Now I'm not saying that I wont ultimately be able to figure it
> > >>>>> out. But a few well written pages can save someone like me hours, and
> > >>>>> perhaps others days. The problem is just that the info is **WAY** too
> > >>>>> terse and assumes understanding of things that one shouldnt assume.
> > >>>>> For example he starts with a handful of lines that explain globalScope
> > >>>>> and contextConfigLocation in the web.xml file. Now, honestly, it took
> > >>>>> me months to get comfortable with the concept of the web.xml file in
> > >>>>> standard servlet development. And the components and layout of a
> > >>>>> web.xml is not exactly newbie friendly. Worse yet, he doesnt show a
> > >>>>> whole, miminal web.xml - just snippets, leaving it to the imagination
> > >>>>> how the whole thing goes together. Its very confusing.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> But zooming back a level, this certainly isnt how I would start
> > >>>>> explaining to a new person how to do a new app or what all of this is
> > >>>>> about.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I could go on and on, but I think you get the idea.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This is not an attack on Joachim, but it is a real issue. One of the
> > >>>>> problems with open source software is that the people that do it are
> > >>>>> so smart that they dont quite understand how to explain what they are
> > >>>>> doing to us dummies. This is particularly true with java/backend
> > >>>>> stuff. I dont understand anything on the apache website!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I realize that you are only on .6 and its not really meant for general
> > >>>>> consumption yet. But explaining how to turn it on, and a getting
> > >>>>> started guide including how to do a hello world would probably be a
> > >>>>> very helpful. It would to me anyway.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I appreciate the good work that you guys are doing. And while I am not
> > >>>>> able to contribute development time, I would be happy to provide some
> > >>>>> structural editing services for documentation. What that really means
> > >>>>> is I am happy to read the doc and tell you where I am totally confused
> > >>>>> and why, and to suggest some structure for the doc. I really do think
> > >>>>> you guys need the help of a few dummies!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>> Hank
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Red5 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

Reply via email to