make sense?
On 11/12/06, dj <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seems that you have ANT_HOME set up properly. Do you have JAVA_HOME on
your PATH?
Yes. I do. Where is this tools.jar file anyway? Should I have ANT_HOME set up
as an environment variable, i didn't notice it but i can type ant server from
any dir and it tries to execute.
I'm excited to get this working,
patrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Send Red5 mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Red5 digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Video vs. VideoDisplay (John Grden)
> 2. Re: Ant failures - I'm stuck as well (Michael Klishin)
> 3. Re: Video vs. VideoDisplay (Michael Klishin)
> 4. Re: compile issues (Michael Klishin)
> 5. Re: Ant build fail - still no luck - next round (dj)
> 6. Re: Ant build fail - still no luck - next round (Michael Klishin)
> 7. Re: Video vs. VideoDisplay (Dan Rossi)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:58:19 -0500
> From: "John Grden" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Red5] Video vs. VideoDisplay
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
> < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I don't know about anything relating to Red5 that would matter.
>
> Metadata is one thing that you don't get with the VideoDisplay component.
> They used to have an event dispatch for it in the beta, and then pulled it
> for the final - I have no idea why. That and you're sure of what's in your
> code - you rid yourself of any unnecessary code you don't need.
>
> it's a nice component however, so, it's not like there's anything wrong with
> using it.
>
> Just my 2cents
>
> On 11/11/06, John Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I built my first Red5 player using the Video class. After looking at the
>> VideoDisplay class it appears to be more robust.
>>
>> What are the pro/cons of using one over the other... specifically when
>> connecting to a Red5 server?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> .j
>> --
>> *Whether you think that you can, or that you can't, you are usually right.
>> *
>> - Henry Ford
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Red5 mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
--
[ JPG ]
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
