you are talking about proxying for geo targeting correct, like the FMS edge system ? so one server and "edge" collects its stream from either the cache or the "origin" server ?

thats what we'd like


our server resources proved not enough for 200MB+ streams in red5, i had to fallback to progressive download while the problem is solved. Our current windows media setup is two servers loading content from a content sevrer over the lan. We'll prob integrate the current machine into this , so 3 red5 machines loading content from a content server accessed via a load balancer hardware. Two of the machines will still be running windows media though.

Aljosa Mohorovic wrote:
On 11/14/06, Sebastian Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  
yes i think clustering is not implemented yet...
    

i actually don't need clustering but "stream forwarding". flash client
sends netstream to red5 and then red5 forwards this stream to some
other red5 server.
is this possible? if not, any idea when this will be possible?

Aljosa Mohorovic

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

  

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

Reply via email to