why wrote a socket if we can upstream with red5? that's what I said in the beginning, get a screen compact using png or jpg, and send the changed rectangles..... but as Dario said, V7 goes further... it make the compact the using a video codec... hmm sweet... if FFmpeg can encode flv why red5 can't ? FFmpeg has even a server for streaming..that is bugged.....maybe..hehe maybe...
On 11/24/06, Roberto Saccon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hans Elgelid wrote: > Wouldn't it be possible with eg. 1024x768 capture from a virtual > cameradriver if the the movie desktop played really slow, lets say one frame > per second? > Yes, you can. > Let's say you use 1 fps and 1 keyfrane on each frame ( > setKeyFrameInterval(1); ). > You would need a 1024*768*4 bytes/sec to send the video. It's 3Mbyte/s. > With a proper "encoding" you can send the very same thing using an average > of 8kbyte/s > > Otherise now with the new AcctionScript 3 / haxe ... VM wich for example > built http://osflash.org/fc64 , wouldn't it be possible to deliver > fullscreen pictures at some rate somehow osflash? > AS3 could provide new features... just think about the flashvnc client > Darron Schall did. > With as3 you can implement your own client/server solution. Has anybody tried, can AS3 do that ? Encode the bitmap form the (virtual) cameradriver into screencast codec and upstream with its own socket in REAL-TIME ? regards -- Roberto Saccon _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
-- . m a r c o s a u g u s t o ; .eu vim para confundir e não para explicar!. . . - Chacrinha
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
