Thanks for testing! We're back up to 7 concurrent connections. Most appear to be maintaining about 400-500 kbps, but one seems to be having a hard time maintaining only 250kbps.
Bill henrik weber wrote: > :))) > nice one! signal is much better than before (yesterday's first version) > and although i have here only a 3MBit-line i get the following values: > BufferLength: 3.496 > FrameRate: 19.72 > > it stutters a slight bit (but good enough to use it) but i guess this is > related to my line and the location (germoney)... > > rock on! > > henrik > > btw: while i'm writing the connection seems to get more and more > stable; cool! > > -- > __digitalspices__ > Henrik Weber [MediaDesign&FlashDevelopment] > > home: www.digitalspices.com > > > Interalab wrote: >> On arrival at my office, I found the laptop running fine, but the >> publisher movie in a non-active condition. It had failed sometime >> between 10 pm EDT and 6 am EDT (I'm not sure how far off from GMT we are >> in eastern daylight savings time, so adjust based on Andrew's >> observation). I refreshed the publisher browser and it immediately >> started streaming again. I'm not sure what to make of that. The server >> had no problem accepting the refreshed stream and I never lost >> connection to the shared objects (I'm using them to count users and a >> couple of other things). At the moment, I'm going to blame the >> camera/publisher, as there are no unexpected errors in the red5 log. >> >> Current stats: >> We've had 163 connections to the stream since yesterday at 5 pm. >> Peak concurrent connections was 7 (resulting in about 1.9 Mbps in >> bandwidth use at the time) >> Mem: 963164k total, 852984k used, 110180k free >> Swap: 2819368k total, 251056k used, 2568312k free >> Cpu(s): 0.3% >> uptime 14:26 >> >> Streaming at 320x240, 24 fps, 80% quality, 22k audio, approx >> 300-400kbps publisher. >> >> Andrew Herron wrote: >> >>> Hmmm... well I am trying to watch the stream now 06:55 GMT on Thursday >>> and I see a brief flash and then nothing except 'Buffer length' and >>> 'Framerate' which are both 0 >>> >>> It clearly was doing good things earlier so maybe the camera or your >>> laptop have caused a problem? >>> >>> Andrew >>> >>> On 4/26/07, *Sales Department* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >>> >>> There was a change made to the trunk (I think by Joachim) in >>> >>> > > org.red5.server.stream.PlaylistSubscriberStream >>> >>> This line appears to have been removed. The purpose of the >>> section was to manage something to do with low latency/low >>> bandwidth connections, but it seems that it also introduced some >>> choppiness. I haven't seen the hiccups since we compiled the >>> latest trunk. >>> >>> > > >>> > > if (pendingVideos > 1 || writeDelta[0] > writeDelta[1]) { >>> > > >>> >>> Bill >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Dan Rossi" < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 9:51:28 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York >>> Subject: Re: [Red5] live test - again >>> >>> Hi its fine now, what did you do ? >>> >>> Storm wrote: >>> > It's working pretty well here (from Málaga, Spain). "BufferLength" >>> > says: 1.858 all the time, and i've just noticed a few macroblocks in >>> > the video by they're gone now. >>> > >>> > On 4/26/07, *Interalab* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: >>> > >>> > I have updated to the trunk revision 1932 which does not >>> contain the >>> > "pending videos" code. >>> > >>> > We're re-launched the live camera (pointed at the road >>> again) and will >>> > leave it up all night. Please take a look and report back on >>> > quality if >>> > you have a chance. >>> > >>> > http://www.magicoast.com/media_center/embedded_player.html >>> > >>> > Thanks to everyone who helped test this today. >>> > >>> > I guess this was a day for testing . . . the video >>> conference and the >>> > multiple streaming tests seemed to go well too! >>> > >>> > Bill >>> > >>> > Al Melquist wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Video stream stopped >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -----Original Message----- >>> > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>] *On >>> > > Behalf Of *Lenny Sorey >>> > > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 25, 2007 1:18 PM >>> > > *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto: >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> > > *Subject:* Re: [Red5] live webcam test >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Joachim, >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > I made your suggested change bellow and recompiled. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Now the streaming side seems to be back working. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Exactly what impact does this change make? >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Thanks. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Lenny >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On 4/25/07, *Joachim Bauch* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >>> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Hi Klaus, >>> > > >>> > > Klaus schrieb: >>> > > > Check conf/red5-common.xml >>> > > [...] >>> > > > Remove the bean with >>> > org.red5.server.stream.SimpleBWControlService and >>> > > > remove comments around the bean with DummyBWControlService. >>> > > >>> > > this will only change the way Red5 uses the bandwidth >>> settings >>> > defined >>> > > in serverside code. >>> > > >>> > > Another thing you could test is changing line 1780 in >>> > > org.red5.server.stream.PlaylistSubscriberStream from >>> > > >>> > > if (pendingVideos > 1 || writeDelta[0] > writeDelta[1]) { >>> > > >>> > > to >>> > > >>> > > if (pendingVideos > 1) { >>> > > >>> > > Recompile and restart Red5 afterwards. This will change >>> the handling >>> > > of slow client connections to drop less frames. However >>> without >>> > this >>> > > check, I had issues with clients from low-latency, >>> low-bandwidth >>> > > connections. You seem to have high-latency, high-bandwidth >>> so maybe >>> > > we need different checks to handle both cases. >>> > > >>> > > Please let me know if this helped with your problems. >>> > > >>> > > Joachim >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > Red5 mailing list >>> > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> <mailto: >>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> >>> > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org >>> <http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org> >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > Red5 mailing list >>> > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org >>> > > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Red5 mailing list >>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > If a man speaks in a forest and his wife is not there, is he >>> still wrong? >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Red5 mailing list >>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org >>> > >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Red5 mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Red5 mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Red5 mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Red5 mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
