Hi Eugene,
Thanks for your mail. The problem I got when trying to cluster the server is
not related to Spring really but is due to the broadcasting between the
server nodes. We have a "Subscribers with Broadcaster" model in both live
stream and shared object cases, where one broadcaster needs to broadcast
events to several subscribers that might be connected to different server
nodes.

Currently for a non-clustering version, we use a list for subscribers that
have subscribed to a specific broadcaster but I don't know how to use TC to
cluster this model. Do you have any idea about this problem?

On 5/19/07, Eugene Kuleshov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Guys,

  I am one of the developers who implemented Spring support for Terracotta
DSO, and I have really good idea what it can and what it can't do. On the
other hand I know really little about red5, so please bear with me. :-)

  So, can you please explain to me what data exactly you need to cluster
in
red5?

  Can you also elaborate on what makes it difficult for you to learn for
to
integrate Spring?

  Also, I don't quite understand your concerns about standalone vs. tomcat
(or other web servers). It is your own choice actually and Terracotta
works
in both cases.

  It might be easier for you to get your questions answered in the
Terracotta mailing lists (tc-user or tc-dev) that you can subscribe to at
http://terracotta.org/confluence/display/orgsite/Mailing+Lists

  regards,
  Eugene



Dan Rossi-5 wrote:
>
> I think i hit a wall already, in this integration examples it says to
> load an application context file , im assuming its the red5-web.xml for
> each webapp, however all the bean id's are named the same ie
> web.handler, i took a look at the war configs and they are named
> differently, still not sure what to put in here
>
>
http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/docs1/Integrations+Spring#IntegrationsSpring-Howtouseit
>
> Dan Rossi wrote:
>> Ok damn, just checked out the samples and seems like its going to take
a
>> while to learn to integrate with spring, in a standalone and tomcat
>> situation. Ill just continue on this custom stats logging and come back
>> to it :)
>>
>> Dan Rossi wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Im going to be looking at this scenario very shortly, however does
>>> this setup have its own caching and RMI mechanisms , or will I still
be
>>> using the internal one setup in red5. What is the benefits of using
>>> something like this with tomcat as oppose to stand alone ? I do find
it
>>> a PIA to make the updates i need, where a war file into tomcat is so
>>> much simpler just to update the server and applications.
>>>
>>>  From looking at the demonstration video, im curious to know if its
>>> going to be  possible for red5 apps to share the same published names.
>>> Ie, publish a broadcast to our load balancer ip which chooses a server
>>> and then starts archiving to our SAN, and then the subscribers are
also
>>> connected to the load balancer, and when a broadcast has happened, all
>>> connected clients will get the call being sent from the application to
>>> switch to the stream. This would be most interesting to see if its
>>> possible.
>>>
>>> Let me know what others may be doing with it.
>>>
>>> thanks.
>>>
>>> Dan
>

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Terracotta-%2B-Red5-tf3775671.html#a10690836
Sent from the Red5 - English mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org




--
I cannot tell why this heart languishes in silence. It is for small needs it
never asks, or knows or remembers.  -- Tagore

Best Regards
Steven Gong
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

Reply via email to