Hi Steve and Eugene,

I just wanted to thank you guys for spending time helping some of us
get Red5 running under Terracotta. I think that this combination, once
the kinks are worked out, will be very powerful and should provide a
solution for scaling Red5 applications in an elegant way. This is
obviously something that many us  are interested in.

-Chris

On 5/19/07, sharrissf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Terracotta has a concept called DMI Distributed method invocation. Some of
> our examples use this to update remote GUI's when models change. What you
> are describing sounds like it could also benefit from dmi. It's not a good
> idea to overuse this concept but it is useful for notification in cases
> where wait and notify aren't practical. Here is a link to the concept:
> http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/docs1/Concept+and+Architecture+Guide#ConceptandArchitectureGuide-DistributedMethodInvocation%28DMI%29
>
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
>
> Steven Gong wrote:
> >
> > Hi Eugene,
> > Thanks for your mail. The problem I got when trying to cluster the server
> > is
> > not related to Spring really but is due to the broadcasting between the
> > server nodes. We have a "Subscribers with Broadcaster" model in both live
> > stream and shared object cases, where one broadcaster needs to broadcast
> > events to several subscribers that might be connected to different server
> > nodes.
> >
> > Currently for a non-clustering version, we use a list for subscribers that
> > have subscribed to a specific broadcaster but I don't know how to use TC
> > to
> > cluster this model. Do you have any idea about this problem?
> >
> > On 5/19/07, Eugene Kuleshov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Guys,
> >>
> >>   I am one of the developers who implemented Spring support for
> >> Terracotta
> >> DSO, and I have really good idea what it can and what it can't do. On the
> >> other hand I know really little about red5, so please bear with me. :-)
> >>
> >>   So, can you please explain to me what data exactly you need to cluster
> >> in
> >> red5?
> >>
> >>   Can you also elaborate on what makes it difficult for you to learn for
> >> to
> >> integrate Spring?
> >>
> >>   Also, I don't quite understand your concerns about standalone vs.
> >> tomcat
> >> (or other web servers). It is your own choice actually and Terracotta
> >> works
> >> in both cases.
> >>
> >>   It might be easier for you to get your questions answered in the
> >> Terracotta mailing lists (tc-user or tc-dev) that you can subscribe to at
> >> http://terracotta.org/confluence/display/orgsite/Mailing+Lists
> >>
> >>   regards,
> >>   Eugene
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Dan Rossi-5 wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I think i hit a wall already, in this integration examples it says to
> >> > load an application context file , im assuming its the red5-web.xml for
> >> > each webapp, however all the bean id's are named the same ie
> >> > web.handler, i took a look at the war configs and they are named
> >> > differently, still not sure what to put in here
> >> >
> >> >
> >> http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/docs1/Integrations+Spring#IntegrationsSpring-Howtouseit
> >> >
> >> > Dan Rossi wrote:
> >> >> Ok damn, just checked out the samples and seems like its going to take
> >> a
> >> >> while to learn to integrate with spring, in a standalone and tomcat
> >> >> situation. Ill just continue on this custom stats logging and come
> >> back
> >> >> to it :)
> >> >>
> >> >> Dan Rossi wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hi Im going to be looking at this scenario very shortly, however does
> >> >>> this setup have its own caching and RMI mechanisms , or will I still
> >> be
> >> >>> using the internal one setup in red5. What is the benefits of using
> >> >>> something like this with tomcat as oppose to stand alone ? I do find
> >> it
> >> >>> a PIA to make the updates i need, where a war file into tomcat is so
> >> >>> much simpler just to update the server and applications.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>  From looking at the demonstration video, im curious to know if its
> >> >>> going to be  possible for red5 apps to share the same published
> >> names.
> >> >>> Ie, publish a broadcast to our load balancer ip which chooses a
> >> server
> >> >>> and then starts archiving to our SAN, and then the subscribers are
> >> also
> >> >>> connected to the load balancer, and when a broadcast has happened,
> >> all
> >> >>> connected clients will get the call being sent from the application
> >> to
> >> >>> switch to the stream. This would be most interesting to see if its
> >> >>> possible.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Let me know what others may be doing with it.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> thanks.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Dan
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/Terracotta-%2B-Red5-tf3775671.html#a10690836
> >> Sent from the Red5 - English mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Red5 mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I cannot tell why this heart languishes in silence. It is for small needs
> > it
> > never asks, or knows or remembers.  -- Tagore
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Steven Gong
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Red5 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Terracotta-%2B-Red5-tf3775671.html#a10699323
> Sent from the Red5 - English mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

Reply via email to