Hm... 600 simultanious streams at 350 kbps ( different streams if I
understand) then one stream use 350/600 = 583 bps = 72 Bps. There must be
some misunderstood ?!

Brane



-----Izvirno sporočilo-----
Od: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namesto Mark
de Jong [NetMasters BV]
Poslano: 15. junij 2007 17:57
Za: [email protected]
Zadeva: Re: [Red5] Load balancing for live streams

Hi Martijn, Timon and Dan,
 
Why should it be I/O intensive? Are you writing a live stream to the HDD in
order to stream this? We have been testing around with Wowza Media Server a
lot (and have done a live pilot with it). We had about 600 simultanious
streams at 350Kbps and we used about 12,5% of the resources of the server we
used (we have been testing around with different types of hardware with
Wowza and have recieved very good results with it). AFAIK know Wowza did it
by using memory instead of writing it as a file and also has a way to
duplicate live streams to other servers. I don't know how Red5 handles this
but it is worth trying to do it on a different way then writing it as a
file? 

PS: I'm not a technician I'm just a salesperson that loves tech :)

Kind regards,

Mark de Jong 
NetMasters/FlashHosting
www.flashhosting.nl
 

________________________________

Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Martijn van Beek
Verzonden: vrijdag 15 juni 2007 14:32
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: [Red5] Load balancing for live streams


I'm currently experimenting with ssh mounts in Linux.
I can read out the directory of the other server within Red5 but it fails to
load the flv somehow.

I noticed that Red5 handles everything very well but when a lot of people
want to access the same stream at the same time the I/O is killing my server
(Dual Duo Core Xeon with 4 GB RAM). 

Could Terracotta handle this? 


On 6/15/07, Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

        I think there has been talk of implementing terracotta which may
make
        this possible. We publish to one server currently.
        
        
        Timon Reinhard wrote:
        > Hi!
        >
        > Is there any way to distribute a live videostream using two or
more 
        > machines running red5?
        >
        > Thanks.
        >
        
        
        
        _______________________________________________
        Red5 mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
        




_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

__________ NOD32 2332 (20070615) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com



_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

Reply via email to