What about making your changes then "rejecting" the page in workflow and have it go back to the previous author?
Cheers, Gavin 2008/10/28 maiott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Moring all. > > We have just started to allow web authors to edit their own pages, > which is great in some ways but I'm sure will be a headache in others. > Any the problem is that if we get a call from a web author about a > problem they are having with creating/editing their page, we currently > have to get them to release the page, and let us do anychanges to > correct the problem. > This is fine, but when we then go to release the page back to the web > author, they can't edit the page because it is still in the workflow. > > The workflow is set up that the author edits the page, releases the > page, we check the page and if we are happy release the page to our > staging server, then we release the page to the live server. Don't > ask about the staging server, it is used more for web applications > then for my use but we have to use it to keep things in sync. > > The question is how can I set the workflow up so that if I make any > changes to the page that it can be sent back to the web author with > the corrections done but not have to release the page for publishing? > > Does that make any sense? > > Maiott > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/RedDot-CMS-Users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
