I don't believe this is possible. If an image isn't being used on a page somewhere, it wouldn't have a publication package attached to it and would likely just publish to the root. There might be a fancy workaround but all I can think of doing is just having a dummy page with a text element that you can drop all the images you need published onto.
On Jan 27, 7:19 am, MMG Mike <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it possible to have reddot publish assets that are not linked to > anything. We want to manage the images through reddot, however there > is an XML file that references those images and it is not manage in > reddot (long story). So basically wonder if there is a setting to say > "go ahead and publish everything in a particular asset folder" > regardless if it is linked or not. > > Thanks for your time! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/RedDot-CMS-Users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
