We create a "special" page on the tree to attach all the images we want to publish, then give the "special" page a file name like "image- lib.dll" (IIS won't deliver a dll file over the web, even if it is really a text file).
The "special" page is geared toward SmartEdit users to make it easy to select and manage the "special" images they want published. If that seems like too much trouble you could just FTP/copy as Kim suggests. HTH. Regards, Richard Hauer ==================== 5 Limes Pty Limited www.5Limes.com.au On Jan 28, 10:02 am, kimdezen <[email protected]> wrote: > Ive had success doing this kind of thing before whereby all of my > Assets were stored in the filesystem (rather than the database). > > We set up a nightly FTP job which copied the entire contents of a > folder from the RedDot server to a specific location on the server > where our site was hosted. > > Hope that helps, > Kim > > On Jan 28, 2:19 am, MMG Mike <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Is it possible to have reddot publish assets that are not linked to > > anything. We want to manage the images through reddot, however there > > is an XML file that references those images and it is not manage in > > reddot (long story). So basically wonder if there is a setting to say > > "go ahead and publish everything in a particular asset folder" > > regardless if it is linked or not. > > > Thanks for your time!- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/RedDot-CMS-Users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
