We have a RedDot 7.5 CMS project that the content is already populated and is served out to LiveServer
The pages are all published with the page id’s (i.e. 146.htm). Although fairly straight forward to rename pages, the business is revisiting whether they can implement a folder structure. i.e. instead of www.domain.com/136.htm, they want www.domain.com/investorrelations/ etc., possibly 3 levels down. Supposedly quite a ways back in the project the vendor that created the templates and structure said it was extremely complex to go to subfolder setup and also difficult to maintain. They also mentioned a limitation in Asset Manager that imposed a 2? level folder limitation as well? It’s hard to debate that as I’m still quite a newbie but the business is asking for it again and the vendor is not really engaged in the project anymore. My questions: • Is it generally hard to implement a folder structure layout that mimics the navigation structure and does either version 9 or 10 introduce anything new that makes life simpler in this area. Is the issues more with LiveServer than with CMS? • Does either version 9 or 10 introduce anything new in the Asset Manager area that removes the folder level limitation? Not looking at in depth feedback as realize might engage a contractor to work through this but not sure if this a big deal or not?, and then go from there. Seems other sites such as http://www.ama.ab.ca seem to work the hierarchy into the filename as opposed to a folder structure seemingly supporting the claim, but other sites like http://www.edmonton.ca seem to have a hierarchy but unsure if it's using LiveServer. Any feedback appreciated!! Thanks, ./tc
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
