So... nobody has a clue as to why the doctype would be stripped out of one template, but not the other when the code is the same?
On Apr 25, 1:25 pm, Dave R <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, I've got 2 content classes with 1 template each. They exist in a > master project and are shared out to multiple child projects. In all > cases, one content class publishes out fine, but the other removes the > doctype on publish or page preview. W3C compliance is set to XHTML in > the project variant. > > Properly Publishes: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > <%txt_Pre_Page_ASCII_Code%> > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> > > Fails to Properly Publish: > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > <%txt_Pre_Page_ASCII_Code%> > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> > > Any suggestions on what I should try to correct this issue? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
