I saw that, but thought it was only relevant to the "All version Compatible 
Solution".

So, what is the value of changing the "islink" in version 7.5?

curtis

From: Jian Huang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, December 10, 2012 11:58 AM
To: 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: publish issues

Oh, forgot to mention, at the bottom of the article, though it is easy to miss, 
but it says

Page 1 and page 2 still get published according to different publication 
packages, but links generated always point to the pages' main link

-Jian

On Monday, December 10, 2012 11:55:06 AM UTC-5, Jian Huang wrote:
Hi Curtis,

If the page only contains link produced with either solutions, then the follow 
pages won't be crawled.  Please note that the non-fixed links can't even appear 
in HTML comments or preexecution comments, CMS still pick those up and crawl 
them.

Now, if you publish any pages that are connected to multiple locations, then 
the pages will get publish multiple times.

There is a fix to it.  For those lists that contains pages with multiple 
connections, attached a publication package that publish them to a folder, I 
usually name it, norobot, then configure your indexer not to crawl this folder.

-Jian

On Monday, December 10, 2012 11:45:37 AM UTC-5, Curtis Kimball wrote:
The rendertag works now that the flag was changed.
The current issue is that the pages still publish to the route.
This is an issue mainly because it could be indexed as duplicate content
Also that this results in different pages being published to the same URL in 
the root.

The information on your blog led me to believe that changing the islink would 
trick  CMS into thinking the following pages are references, hence NOT to crawl 
and publish following pages.



From: Jian Huang <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, December 10, 2012 10:52 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: publish issues

Hi Curtis,

I believe the rendertag code method was not rendering was because flag value in 
RDserver.ini was not set to 1024 or 1248 and navigation manager was not 
activate in project settings.  It was working once activated.

Yes, the rendertag method only changes the links to mainlink, would not prevent 
the following pages from publishing to other locations.  Likewise, so does the 
islink=2 to islink=10 method.

Please elaborate on "it wasn't working".  Is it not producing the link 
correctly or it produced the link, but page still publishes to multiple 
locations?

On Monday, December 10, 2012 9:16:45 AM UTC-5, Curtis Kimball wrote:
Actually, since we're using version 7.5, the "obsolete" solution should work 
and that is supposed to not publish the following pages.

Edit the content class of "RSS Listing", use preexecution to replace islink=2 
with islink=10 to trick CMS into thinking the following pages are references, 
hence not to crawl and publish following pages.

Just trying to figure out why it's not working.

curtis
From: Nathan Palmer <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, December 7, 2012 1:44 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: publish issues

Jian's fix doesn't prevent the pages from publishing out in multiple places, it 
only prevents them from having any links reference them. So if you've done it 
properly you'll still see those pages publish in multiple places but all the 
links on the site should point to the same location (the main link).

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Kimball, Curtis <[email protected]> wrote:
Turns out that navigation manager has to be turned on and ours was not.
That resolved the rendertag output issue.

We are still having pages publish out twice despite being "referenced" and not 
connected.

Still trying to identify where and why.

Curtis

From: Bob Foster <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, December 7, 2012 11:51 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: publish issues

Curtis,

Let us take a look at the code for this.

Rob

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 5, 2012, at 12:47 PM, "Kimball, Curtis" <[email protected]> wrote:

Thanks
We found something similar and have been trying to implement what Jian has on 
the blog.
Fortunately, we are still on version 7.5 so we are also implementing the code 
to change the link to be viewed as a reference.

The problem we are having currently is the rendertag code is outputting code as 
text and not inserting the url as needed:
So this is the published code:

<li>linkgoeshere<ahref="<%!! 
Context:Pages.GetPage(Guid:AB7A9B75374941D3B578150B434B0D85).GetUrl(Bool:True) 
!!%>"><spanclass="relatedLink">Accounting / Auditing (MS)</span></a>


Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?

Haven't done anything with rendertags before.


Curtis

From: Nathan Palmer <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 10:50 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: publish issues

Confirmed, and it's the bane of implementations everywhere. However, there are 
a few well-accepted practices you can follow to avoid problems:

 1.  Never use "Connect Existing Page" for links. Always use "Reference Page".
 2.  Take advantage of Jian Huang's wonderful plugin to find pages that are 
connected in multiple locations so you can fix them: 
http://simplyreddot.blogspot.com/2012/03/check-multiple-page-connections.html
 3.  For keyword lists (where pages have to be connected rather than 
referenced) use render tags to generate the link URL so it goes to the main 
link. See http://simplyreddot.blogspot.com/2012/01/duplicate-pages.html

Hope this helps.

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Joel Kinzel <[email protected]> wrote:
I think we will need more information. What version are you running? Are you 
publishing locally or via FTP? What settings are you using (all following/all 
related checked?)?


On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 2:38:23 PM UTC-6, Curtis Kimball wrote:
Can anyone confirm that publishing will NOT only follow the connection of the 
main link as described, but will actually publish multiple times based on every 
connection throughout the site.

Reddot support says they don't have me in their system despite being a customer 
for 7 years.



>Original Message

  From: [email protected]

Sent: 12/04/2012 13:59:38

To: [email protected]

Subject: publishing from multiple lists





  I have a page in a project that I want to publish to a specific directory.

http://webdevsrv.snhu.edu/online-degrees/graduate-degrees/English-and-Creative-Writing-MA.asp

We created the publication package, made sure that was the main link,  and got 
the file to publish where we want it.

The problem is that that same page is connected to other lists as well. (like 
the navigation on the left side)

http://webdevsrv.snhu.edu/online-degrees/graduate-degrees/english-and-creative-writing-MA-online/English-and-Creative-Writing-MA.asp

Those other lists have different publication packages on them. (and they need 
to be that way)

I do NOT want the original page publishing to multiple paths.

I thought that the publication would follow only the MAIN link.

When I look at the page info it says that the pub path is correct.

How do I stop the page from publishing with multiple paths?

Curtis

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RedDot CMS Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reddot-cms-users/-/XwN1GlS2iLwJ.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RedDot CMS Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RedDot CMS Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RedDot CMS Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RedDot CMS Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RedDot CMS Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RedDot CMS Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reddot-cms-users/-/Ckr6t7LHYOIJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RedDot CMS Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reddot-cms-users/-/cndH16EJYaMJ.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RedDot CMS Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to