No value since a better solution is found.  I listed it there for 2 reasons

1. SEO, so people can search and find it without knowledge of a newer 
solution.
2. Context, can't really introduce a new solution without explaining the 
history and theory behind things.

-Jian

On Monday, December 10, 2012 12:29:02 PM UTC-5, Curtis Kimball wrote:
>
> I saw that, but thought it was only relevant to the "All version 
> Compatible Solution".
>
> So, what is the value of changing the "islink" in version 7.5?
>
> curtis
>
> From: Jian Huang <[email protected] <javascript:>>
> Reply-To: "[email protected] <javascript:>" <
> [email protected] <javascript:>>
> Date: Monday, December 10, 2012 11:58 AM
> To: "[email protected] <javascript:>" <
> [email protected] <javascript:>>
> Subject: Re: publish issues
>
> Oh, forgot to mention, at the bottom of the article, though it is easy to 
> miss, but it says
>
> *Page 1 and page 2 still get published according to different publication 
> packages, but links generated always point to the pages' main link *
>
> -Jian
>
> On Monday, December 10, 2012 11:55:06 AM UTC-5, Jian Huang wrote: 
>>
>> Hi Curtis,
>>
>> If the page only contains link produced with either solutions, then the 
>> follow pages won't be crawled.  Please note that the non-fixed links can't 
>> even appear in HTML comments or preexecution comments, CMS still pick those 
>> up and crawl them.
>>
>> Now, if you publish any pages that are connected to multiple locations, 
>> then the pages will get publish multiple times.
>>
>> There is a fix to it.  For those lists that contains pages with multiple 
>> connections, attached a publication package that publish them to a folder, 
>> I usually name it, norobot, then configure your indexer not to crawl this 
>> folder.
>>
>> -Jian
>>
>> On Monday, December 10, 2012 11:45:37 AM UTC-5, Curtis Kimball wrote: 
>>>
>>> The rendertag works now that the flag was changed.
>>> The current issue is that the pages still publish to the route.
>>> This is an issue mainly because it could be indexed as duplicate content
>>> Also that this results in different pages being published to the same 
>>> URL in the root.
>>>
>>> The information on your blog led me to believe that changing the islink 
>>> would trick  CMS into thinking the following pages are references, hence 
>>> NOT to crawl and publish following pages.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Jian Huang <[email protected]>
>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Monday, December 10, 2012 10:52 AM
>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: publish issues
>>>
>>> Hi Curtis,
>>>
>>> I believe the rendertag code method was not rendering was because flag 
>>> value in RDserver.ini was not set to 1024 or 1248 and navigation manager 
>>> was not activate in project settings.  It was working once activated.
>>>
>>> Yes, the rendertag method only changes the links to mainlink, would not 
>>> prevent the following pages from publishing to other locations.  Likewise, 
>>> so does the islink=2 to islink=10 method.
>>>
>>> Please elaborate on "it wasn't working".  Is it not producing the link 
>>> correctly or it produced the link, but page still publishes to multiple 
>>> locations?
>>>
>>> On Monday, December 10, 2012 9:16:45 AM UTC-5, Curtis Kimball wrote: 
>>>>
>>>> Actually, since we're using version 7.5, the "obsolete" solution should 
>>>> work and that is supposed to not publish the following pages.
>>>>
>>>> *Edit the content class of "RSS Listing", use preexecution to replace 
>>>> islink=2 with islink=10 to trick CMS into thinking the following pages are 
>>>> references, hence not to crawl and publish following pages. *
>>>>
>>>> Just trying to figure out why it's not working.
>>>>
>>>> curtis
>>>> From: Nathan Palmer <[email protected]>
>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Friday, December 7, 2012 1:44 PM
>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: publish issues
>>>>
>>>> Jian's fix doesn't prevent the pages from publishing out in multiple 
>>>> places, it only prevents them from having any links reference them. So if 
>>>> you've done it properly you'll still see those pages publish in multiple 
>>>> places but all the links on the site should point to the same location 
>>>> (the 
>>>> main link).
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Kimball, Curtis <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Turns out that navigation manager has to be turned on and ours was not.
>>>>> That resolved the rendertag output issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> We are still having pages publish out twice despite being "referenced" 
>>>>> and not connected.
>>>>>
>>>>> Still trying to identify where and why.
>>>>>
>>>>> Curtis
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Bob Foster <[email protected]>
>>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]
>>>>> >
>>>>> Date: Friday, December 7, 2012 11:51 AM
>>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: publish issues
>>>>>
>>>>> Curtis,
>>>>>
>>>>> Let us take a look at the code for this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rob
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 5, 2012, at 12:47 PM, "Kimball, Curtis" <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> We found something similar and have been trying to implement what Jian 
>>>>> has on the blog.
>>>>> Fortunately, we are still on version 7.5 so we are also implementing 
>>>>> the code to change the link to be viewed as a reference.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem we are having currently is the rendertag code is 
>>>>> outputting code as text and not inserting the url as needed:
>>>>> So this is the published code:
>>>>>
>>>>> <li>linkgoeshere<ahref="<%!! 
>>>>> Context:Pages.GetPage(Guid:AB7A9B75374941D3B578150B434B0D85).GetUrl(Bool:True)
>>>>>  
>>>>> !!%>"><spanclass="relatedLink">Accounting / Auditing (MS)</span></a>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> Haven't done anything with rendertags before.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Curtis
>>>>> From: Nathan Palmer <[email protected]>
>>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]
>>>>> >
>>>>> Date: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 10:50 AM
>>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: publish issues
>>>>>
>>>>> Confirmed, and it's the bane of implementations everywhere. However, 
>>>>> there are a few well-accepted practices you can follow to avoid problems:
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. Never use "Connect Existing Page" for links. Always use 
>>>>>    "Reference Page". 
>>>>>    2. Take advantage of Jian Huang's wonderful plugin to find pages 
>>>>>    that are connected in multiple locations so you can fix them: 
>>>>>    
>>>>> http://simplyreddot.blogspot.com/2012/03/check-multiple-page-connections.html
>>>>>    3. For keyword lists (where pages have to be connected rather than 
>>>>>    referenced) use render tags to generate the link URL so it goes to the 
>>>>> main 
>>>>>    link. See 
>>>>>    http://simplyreddot.blogspot.com/2012/01/duplicate-pages.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope this helps.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Joel Kinzel <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we will need more information. What version are you running? 
>>>>>> Are you publishing locally or via FTP? What settings are you using (all 
>>>>>> following/all related checked?)? 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 2:38:23 PM UTC-6, Curtis Kimball wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can anyone confirm that publishing will NOT only follow the 
>>>>>>> connection of the main link as described, but will actually publish 
>>>>>>> multiple times based on every connection throughout the site.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reddot support says they don't have me in their system despite being 
>>>>>>> a customer for 7 years.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >Original Message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   From: [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent: 12/04/2012 13:59:38
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Subject: publishing from multiple lists
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   I have a page in a project that I want to publish to a specific 
>>>>>>> directory.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://webdevsrv.snhu.edu/**online-degrees/graduate-**
>>>>>>> degrees/English-and-Creative-**Writing-MA.asp<http://webdevsrv.snhu.edu/online-degrees/graduate-degrees/English-and-Creative-Writing-MA.asp>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We created the publication package, made sure that was the main 
>>>>>>> link,  and got the file to publish where we want it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The problem is that that same page is connected to other lists as 
>>>>>>> well. (like the navigation on the left side)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://webdevsrv.snhu.edu/**online-degrees/graduate-**
>>>>>>> degrees/english-and-creative-**writing-MA-online/English-and-**
>>>>>>> Creative-Writing-MA.asp<http://webdevsrv.snhu.edu/online-degrees/graduate-degrees/english-and-creative-writing-MA-online/English-and-Creative-Writing-MA.asp>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Those other lists have different publication packages on them. (and 
>>>>>>> they need to be that way)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I do NOT want the original page publishing to multiple paths.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I thought that the publication would follow only the MAIN link.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When I look at the page info it says that the pub path is correct.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How do I stop the page from publishing with multiple paths?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Curtis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reddot-cms-users/-/XwN1GlS2iLwJ. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reddot-cms-users/-/Ckr6t7LHYOIJ.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
>>>
>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "RedDot CMS Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reddot-cms-users/-/cndH16EJYaMJ.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected] <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RedDot CMS Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reddot-cms-users/-/PMqKZRMrfnsJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to