On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Douglas F. Elznic wrote:
>On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, Scott McDermott wrote:
>> This is the wrong approach and is not very dissimilar from spam. All
>> that would be accomplished here was to prove that we are well-connected
>> fanatics.
>
>I guess you don't vote. How is a large number of well thought and well
>said arguments equvalent to spam. I did not say send the editors a buch of
>messages saying you suck and so does your article. In my letter to
>the editors I listed URL's to go to to clarify the discrepancies in their
>article and other useful resources. I have trouble equating what I did to
>spamming, but maybe you can clarify that for me.
A technical debate is not won with volume, it's won with technical merit.
Frankly, there are very few people--very few--that are competent enough
to technically compare Linux to any other operating system. Hell, there
are few enough people that actually understand what defines an operating
system to begin with and that "Linux" *isn't* an operating system.
--
Steve Coile
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
