On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, Scott McDermott wrote:
> This is the wrong approach and is not very dissimilar from spam.  All
> that would be accomplished here was to prove that we are well-connected
> fanatics.
> 
I guess you don't vote. How is a large number of well thought and well
said arguments equvalent to spam. I did not say send the editors a buch of
messages saying you suck and so does your article. In my letter to
the editors I listed URL's to go to to clarify the discrepancies in their
article and other useful resources. I have trouble equating what I did to
spamming, but maybe you can clarify that for me.


--
Douglas F. Elznic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"If they give you lined paper, write the other way."
Freedom through Electronic Resistance


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
         To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Reply via email to