The asserrtion that Microsoft ftopped at 3.2 is false. 3.2 was VERY buggy and
3.3 was released shortly after 3.2.
Paul Anderson
"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, CH wrote:
>
> > > An interesting side note - MS-DOS basicly stopped development at version
> > > 3.2
> You should have quoted the full statment - MS stopped at 3.2 untill DR-DOS
> come out.
> >
> > How is that so since the last ms-dos version was 6.22 before Win95 shows up
> > with so called MS-Dos 7.0 labeled as Windows 95?
> >
> > CH
> >
> Because Microsoft Came out with 4.0 to match DR-DOS. It was supposed to
> have all the features of DR-DOS, but it didn't. It was also released
> late. There was a battle between the two for features, plus some other
> interesting things, like code being added to the Windows beta to detect if
> it was being run on DR-DOS and exit with an error message, and DR-DOS
> adding code to fool Windows...
>
> Mikkel
> --
>
> Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
> for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
