On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Michael R. Jinks wrote: > Absolutely. Likewise. I had the same reaction. Solaris tar is not > only feature poor, it's also brain damaged. (Try creating an archive > using absolute paths and then restoring using relative paths. If you > figure out how, drop me a line. But careful you don't hose a machine > while trying.) Sorry ... I already tried that one <doh!> ... I'm not going to try again. thornton _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- files with tar.gz John Marlovits
- Re: files with tar.gz John Aldrich
- Re: files with tar.gz Philippe Moutarlier
- Re: files with tar.gz Charles Galpin
- Re: [RHL] files with tar.gz eric clover
- Re: files with tar.gz Vidiot
- Re: files with tar.gz Thornton Prime
- Re: files with tar.gz Michael R. Jinks
- Re: files with tar.gz Thornton Prime
- Re: files with tar.gz Michael R. Jinks
- Re: files with tar.gz Thornton Prime
- Re: files with tar.gz Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: files with tar.gz Thornton Prime
- Re: files with tar.gz Ted Gervais
- Re: files with tar.gz Micah Yoder
- Re: files with tar.gz Mike Burger
- Re: files with tar.gz Luke C Gavel
- Re: files with tar.gz Bret Hughes
- Re: files with tar.gz peter
- Re: files with tar.gz lee johnson
- FTP Martin Bartlett