Why not do an "rpm -ivh" instead...have both versions side by side, and
make sure that the 686 version flies for you.
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Peter Kiem wrote:
> I've installed the .i386 version of the kernel and completely forgot there
> was a .i686 version available.
>
> I would like to install the .i686 version instead but if wont let me do a
> "rpm -Fvh" or "rpm -Uvh" of the .i686 kernel rpm.
>
> Is it safe in this case to use a "--force" and will that in fact put the
> i686 version in place of the i386 version I previously installed?
>
> Regards,
> +-----------------------+---------------------------------+
> | Peter Kiem | E-Mail : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
> | Zordah IT | Mobile : +61 0414 724 766 |
> | IT Consultancy & | WWW : www.zordah.net |
> | Internet Hosting | ICQ : "Zordah" 866661 |
> +-----------------------+---------------------------------+
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
