Re: A kernel rpm question

[Mikkel L. Ellertson]

On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Mike Burger wrote:

> Why not do an "rpm -ivh" instead...have both versions side by side, and
> make sure that the 686 version flies for you.
>
Because both packages have the same name?

:-)

(The RPM files have different names, but the package name is the same.)



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list