> No. THe other end will have to be an IPSec device. For that > matter, I don't think bridging will work either, since each > endpoint would have to be a multihomed machine.
Confused, multihomed machine? My thought was that the brige would run over a tunnel established between the two linux boxes. Since bridges are transparent it should not matter that it is not the router. What would happen if I setup one network on 192.168.1.0 the other on 192.168.2.0 and set the bridge up on 192.168.0.0 with a netmask of 255.255.0.0 would this not make the bridge forward all traffic on all of the private 192.168 blocks over the bridge. Still have the problem of DHCP thought... Hum, any thoughts? Someone said a brige is not filtered and although this is true someone wrote a patch for 2.2 to add a bridgein rule to the ipchains. Does anyone know if a project such as this exists for netfilter? Thanks again, Chad _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
