thanks ok I will try but I don't understand how rpm -qa makes his search. Didn't search installed rpm in a database ? Or the file ? I put rpm for i386 in i386 folder, and rpm for i686 in i686 folder. Quite amazing to me. Wait a minute... I do the tricks... Furthermore 2 rpms are having the same name...for two differents vulnerabilities, weird. Ok I proceeded in two step. I did like you said for the first vulnerability [OK] Did the second one in it own directory [OK] Conclusion [Thanks] ism goes on kernell.
-----Message d'origine----- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : jeudi 14 mars 2002 20:09 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: RE: dependencies errata ecaetera Hi. cd to the directory where you have *all* the new glibc rpms and do: rpm -Fvh glibc-2.2.4-19.3* and all should be fine. ----- Original Message ----- From: Ismael Touama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:46 pm Subject: RE: dependencies errata ecaetera > Hi, > > I rpm -Fvh the revelant glibc RPMs. > when made rpm -qa |grep glibc got: > glibc-2.2.4-13 > glibc-devel-2.2.4-13 > glibc-common-2.2.4-13 > > So try to make the definitiv upgrade (2.2.4-19.3), > and again failed dependencies glibc-common 2.2.4-13 is > needed by glibc-2.2.13 !!! > Grrrr' I did the same with rpm -Uvh...and again !! > Even after reboot... > What's the matter please ? > I don't understand anymore. > I wanted to rpm -ivh kernell today but it's missed ! > > Thanks for the help. > ism > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Saul Arias > Envoyé : mercredi 13 mars 2002 19:34 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : RE: dependencies errata ecaetera > > > Relax, Ismael. You can safely install i386.rpm packages on your > Pentium2 / Pentium 3 / Pentium 4 / Athlon box. > > If you don't find the package you need on the i686 directory, just > grabthe package from i386 and install it. > > google is your friend, a search yielded the following thread, > which you > might want to read: > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&th=9c68cdfcf3725643&rnum=3 > > Hope this helps. > > On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 12:08, Ismael Touama wrote: > > I saw that but I'm on i686 !! > > Could you detail ? > > I can take packages from i386 to put on my i686 architecture ? > > Why is there not in both architecture ? > > Gosh ! headache ! > > Thank you. > > ism > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
