Relegation also takes away any incentive to lose, as teams have now with the 
draft order inversely related to finish. I'd love to see that happen here but 
there's no way in hell in will.
 
As anyone who's seen European futbol knows, the best and most tense games of 
the season are the ones between the relegation strugglers at the end. Those 
games are truly life or death.
 
-- Matt

--- On Thu, 9/24/09, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Ray Salemi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Winning the Wildcard
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, September 24, 2009, 1:32 PM


I say we make a new superleague.

Yankees, Boston, LA, Mets, and a couple of other big markets.

Then you get relegated out of that league down to regular MLB.


On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Beaudoin, John <[email protected]> 
wrote:




The whole relegation mantra is awesome.  I love it.  Then the AAA affiliates 
would be privatized and have a chance to move up from time to time as the KC’s 
and Expo’s of the world get relegated.
 

Interleague play lost its gimmicky luster very quickly.  Get rid of it for 
another generation and then maybe bring it back again.




From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Ray Salemi
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:15 PM



To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Winning the Wildcard



 
Relegation is a hoot.

That would be another interesting twist to MLB.  A six-team league with the 
bottom team relegated to the regular pool.  

Let the revenue elephants fight it out.

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:12 PM, William Marino <[email protected]> wrote:


I don’t think its fewer interleague games, I think it would be better 
interleague games.  Sox vs. Dodgers, Phillies, Cardinals, Cubbies, Mets, etc, 
would all be great series.  Then, though, I guess it starts to look like a 
premier league, like EU soccer.
 




From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Tom Salemi
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:05 PM



To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Winning the Wildcard


 

Again, that's why I'd favor fewer interleague games. I could get amped up with 
a home/away serise against the phillies (assuming the mets were the regular 
rivals of the yanks)

 

it's too random now to generate much excitement.



On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:28 PM, William Marino <[email protected]> wrote:




I like interleague play for two reasons:  first, it creates new opportunities 
for rivalries.  Some of them would be geographic, like the Nats and O’s (of 
course, it would be helpful if the teams didn’t suck), and others that seem 
like they just should happen—wouldn’t a Cubs- Red Sox rivalry be interesting?  
Admittedly, this has not gotten as much traction as I would have thought.  The 
second reason is that it provides so much data about how much better the 
American League is than the National League.  That needs to be addressed for 
the long-term health of the game, and interleague play stats make that point.
 
Btw, not sure wild card winners would fair as well as division champs in the 
WS.  Wild card teams have only one 4 out of 28 times (including both leagues).  
How do the division champions stats look, anyone know?
 




From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of tomsalemi
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 12:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Winning the Wildcard


 

not sure about the tournament, but i agree with interleague play. or at least 
limit it to one or two series.

 

plus, since the NHL is so keen on playing hockey in baseball stadiums. I think 
MLB should schedule some games on a hockey rink. Think of the hijinks!

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:06 PM, rdsalemi <[email protected]> wrote:
I would still like to get rid of interleague play, and have a set of midseason 
regional round-robin tournaments instead.  It would give folks two 
championships to shoot for. 

 

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Beaudoin, John <[email protected]> 
wrote:


Let’s not forget the 1987 Twins winning it all with a regular season record of 
85-77, 52 losses on the road, 25 losses at home.  No wild card back then, but 
still a .525 team won it all.  Compare that to the Sox record of 98-64 in 
2004.  13 games different in the regular season.
 
Let’s face it.  The Wild Card was really the only way to go when the league 
expanded beyond 14 teams.  Sure there’s more revenue in the extended play-off 
rounds, but it just had to happen after 14 teams anyway.  It was the right 
thing to do.
 




From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Steve Gendron
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Winning the Wildcard

 
I know baseball purists hate it, but I really like the wildcard system, and I 
think it is good for baseball.  It keeps many more teams engaged as the season 
winds down, and as you suggest, the second place team in a strong division is 
often a better playoff contender than division winners.  How many wildcard 
entries have won the world series?  Angels back in 2002 (I think),  Sox in 
2004.  Have there been others?

 


 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Ray Salemi
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Winning the Wildcard

There has always been part of me that says, "Ho hum, another wildcard.  I guess 
it will have to do."

Then I realized that the wildcard race is actually quite difficult to win.  It 
hearkens back to the days of old when you were competing against the entire 
league in the standings, and you could not hide behind a weak division.  

-- 
Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in Just 12 
Weeks"
www.leadingafteralayoff.com
<BR

 
 



-- 
Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in Just 12 
Weeks"
www.leadingafteralayoff.com


 


<br

 
 



-- 
Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in Just 12 
Weeks"
www.leadingafteralayoff.com









-- 
Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in Just 12 
Weeks"
www.leadingafteralayoff.com





--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to