Sounds like the Americas Cup thing.

Each of the four contend all year to pick a champion.  All other
contenders play to put forth their challenger.  This is getting too
weird.

 

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Salemi
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Winning the Wildcard

 

I say we make a new superleague.

Yankees, Boston, LA, Mets, and a couple of other big markets.

Then you get relegated out of that league down to regular MLB.

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Beaudoin, John
<[email protected]> wrote:

The whole relegation mantra is awesome.  I love it.  Then the AAA
affiliates would be privatized and have a chance to move up from time to
time as the KC's and Expo's of the world get relegated.

 

Interleague play lost its gimmicky luster very quickly.  Get rid of it
for another generation and then maybe bring it back again.

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Salemi
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:15 PM


To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Winning the Wildcard

 

Relegation is a hoot.

That would be another interesting twist to MLB.  A six-team league with
the bottom team relegated to the regular pool.  

Let the revenue elephants fight it out.

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:12 PM, William Marino <[email protected]>
wrote:

I don't think its fewer interleague games, I think it would be better
interleague games.  Sox vs. Dodgers, Phillies, Cardinals, Cubbies, Mets,
etc, would all be great series.  Then, though, I guess it starts to look
like a premier league, like EU soccer.

 

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Salemi
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:05 PM


To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Winning the Wildcard

 

Again, that's why I'd favor fewer interleague games. I could get amped
up with a home/away serise against the phillies (assuming the mets were
the regular rivals of the yanks)

 

it's too random now to generate much excitement.

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:28 PM, William Marino
<[email protected]> wrote:

I like interleague play for two reasons:  first, it creates new
opportunities for rivalries.  Some of them would be geographic, like the
Nats and O's (of course, it would be helpful if the teams didn't suck),
and others that seem like they just should happen-wouldn't a Cubs- Red
Sox rivalry be interesting?  Admittedly, this has not gotten as much
traction as I would have thought.  The second reason is that it provides
so much data about how much better the American League is than the
National League.  That needs to be addressed for the long-term health of
the game, and interleague play stats make that point.

 

Btw, not sure wild card winners would fair as well as division champs in
the WS.  Wild card teams have only one 4 out of 28 times (including both
leagues).  How do the division champions stats look, anyone know?

 

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of tomsalemi
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 12:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Winning the Wildcard

 

not sure about the tournament, but i agree with interleague play. or at
least limit it to one or two series.

 

plus, since the NHL is so keen on playing hockey in baseball stadiums. I
think MLB should schedule some games on a hockey rink. Think of the
hijinks!

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:06 PM, rdsalemi <[email protected]> wrote:

I would still like to get rid of interleague play, and have a set of
midseason regional round-robin tournaments instead.  It would give folks
two championships to shoot for. 

 

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Beaudoin, John
<[email protected]> wrote:

Let's not forget the 1987 Twins winning it all with a regular season
record of 85-77, 52 losses on the road, 25 losses at home.  No wild card
back then, but still a .525 team won it all.  Compare that to the Sox
record of 98-64 in 2004.  13 games different in the regular season.

 

Let's face it.  The Wild Card was really the only way to go when the
league expanded beyond 14 teams.  Sure there's more revenue in the
extended play-off rounds, but it just had to happen after 14 teams
anyway.  It was the right thing to do.

 

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Gendron
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Winning the Wildcard

 

I know baseball purists hate it, but I really like the wildcard system,
and I think it is good for baseball.  It keeps many more teams engaged
as the season winds down, and as you suggest, the second place team in a
strong division is often a better playoff contender than division
winners.  How many wildcard entries have won the world series?  Angels
back in 2002 (I think),  Sox in 2004.  Have there been others?

 

         

        
________________________________


        From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Salemi
        Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:08 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Winning the Wildcard

        There has always been part of me that says, "Ho hum, another
wildcard.  I guess it will have to do."
        
        Then I realized that the wildcard race is actually quite
difficult to win.  It hearkens back to the days of old when you were
competing against the entire league in the standings, and you could not
hide behind a weak division.  
        
        -- 
        Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's
Productivity in Just 12 Weeks"
        www.leadingafteralayoff.com
<http://www.leadingafteralayoff.com/> 

        <BR

 

 




-- 
Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in
Just 12 Weeks"
www.leadingafteralayoff.com <http://www.leadingafteralayoff.com/> 

 

<br

 

 




-- 
Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in
Just 12 Weeks"
www.leadingafteralayoff.com




 

 




-- 
Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in
Just 12 Weeks"
www.leadingafteralayoff.com





--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to