I also disagree with the idea that football lacks parity because some teams win more than others. The parity is in the rules, not the results. The Patriots won 3 superbowls (should have been 4) due to superior front-office-managers, coaches, and players. The Raiders suck because they are a badly managed organization.
I think if we had a baseball salary cap that the Yankees would be the Raiders of MLB. On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Steve Gendron <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually, I am surprised at the variety of teams that have won > WS championships in the last decade. > > The Patriots did their part to skew this statistic with 3 championships in > 10 years ... and that should have been 4! > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Tom Salemi > *Sent:* Thursday, November 05, 2009 3:33 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Does it need to reach 30? > > > Winners over last 10 years > > 2000 Rams ......... Yankees > 2001 Ravens ........ Diamondbacks > 2002 Patriots ........Angels > 2003 Buccaners ....Marlins > 2004 Patriots ........Red Sox > 2005 Patriots .......White Sox > 2006 Steelers .......Cardinals > 2007 Colts ...........Red Sox > 2008 Giants ..........Phillies > 2009 Steelers ........Yankees > > NFL..... Seven Teams Won SB > MLB..... Eight Teams won WS > > Who has the parity? > > > -- Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in Just 12 Weeks" www.leadingafteralayoff.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
