To continue the debate of last weekend, I was discussing the call with a friend (very pragmatic guy) and all of the stats justifying the call. His response was that the Colts scored with 13 seconds on the clock, and they would almost assuredly have needed more that 13 seconds to go another 30 yards. I pointed out that they would have called different plays, to which he responed they would have been inherently more risky plays because they would have gone for longer yards on average. The 13 seconds for another 30 yards is the best argument I've heard yet why the Pats should have punted.
-----Original Message----- From: Ray Salemi <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Sun Nov 22 09:42:47 2009 Subject: The Onion is Pretty Funny ... Unless it isn't http://www.theonion.com/content/news/patriots_lead_colts_at_halftime -- Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in Just 12 Weeks" www.leadingafteralayoff.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=.
