I have no interest in a token effort. Do or do not do...there is no token.
That said, I don't buy this whole idea that the Sox and the Yankees should distort their rosters with a specific goal of winning the 5 games (max) that Lee will face the other team. The fact of the matter is that this kind of planning always ends in disappointment. Out of 5 games (max) that they might meet each other with Lee pitching the team with Lee will probably win 3 and the other team 2. Maybe 4-1. Very unlikely to be 5-0. The reason we NEED to get Cliff Lee is that we need an ace. Beckett is done, Dice-K never was. Lester and Buckholz are great, but we can't pray for rain 3 games out of 5. Ray On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Dan DiBiase <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, I guess the Sox HAVE to be in on Lee, don't they?? How can you not > make at least a token effort to sign this guy, with > his post-season success (oh, and he's been pretty good during the regular > season, too). Especially if they succeed in getting > someone to take Dice-K off their hands. > > Dan D > Central NJ USA > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Red Sox Citizens" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en. > -- Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide" www.fpgasimulation.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
