There is probably little competitive advantage in being loose-lipped. Look at the Vikings.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It seems like every media outlet has run a "the details behind the Crawford > deal" article. As interesting as they are, they're a but duplicative. > > Makes me wonder though are these articles the result of a Red Sox campaign > to prove they weren't reacting to fan outrage? > > Or are the Sox simply a little more comfortable opening the kimono on this > one because it worked out. > > Probably a bit of both, but this coverage stands out because the Sox are so > typically tight lipped about their methods. Not as bad as the Pats, but not > good. > > http://www.csnne.com/12/11/10/How-Carl-Crawford-became-a-Red-Sox/landing_redsox.html?blockID=371195&feedID=3352 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Red Sox Citizens" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en. > -- Author of Robot Haiku : Poems for humans to read until their robots decide it's kill time. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
