I support the adoption of the document. -- Francisco
On 6/4/16, 7:41 AM, "regext on behalf of James Galvin" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >Since we only got 1 reply to this call for adoption, we would like to >restart it. > >Hopefully, everyone will recall that when we first started this group we >did say that we want to use the DNSOP model of ensuring we have at least >5 indications of support before adopting new documents. > >In the last REGEXT meeting there did seem to be support for this >document but we would like to see that support shown on the mailing >list. > >If folks would please respond and show their support that would be >appreciated! Please do as soon as possible. > >Thanks! > >Antoin and Jim > > > > > >On 23 Apr 2016, at 10:52, James Galvin wrote: > >> At our last meeting Gustavo gave a presentation about this RDAP >> extension and asked for the working group to consider adopting it for >> consideration as a standards track extension. >> >> He had a minor update to do to the document, which he has done with >> this published version. >> >> As an RDAP extension looking for standards track this document falls >> precisely within the remit of this working group. >> >> Please indicate on the list if you support or object to the adoption >> of this document by Saturday, 30 April. >> >> If you object please indicate why you object. >> >> If you support the document please indicate if you have a preference >> for how soon the working group progresses the document: now, soon, or >> later. >> >> If there are no objections the document will be adopted by the working >> group. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Antoin and Jim >> co-chairs regext > >_______________________________________________ >regext mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
