So far only two folks have indicated support for adopting this document:
Andy Newton and Francisco Arias.
As previously agreed we need at least 5 expressions of support to adopt
this document.
This is one last call for support. If we don’t get 3 more then this
document will not be adopted as a working group document.
Antoin and Jim
On 4 Jun 2016, at 10:41, James Galvin wrote:
Since we only got 1 reply to this call for adoption, we would like to
restart it.
Hopefully, everyone will recall that when we first started this group
we did say that we want to use the DNSOP model of ensuring we have at
least 5 indications of support before adopting new documents.
In the last REGEXT meeting there did seem to be support for this
document but we would like to see that support shown on the mailing
list.
If folks would please respond and show their support that would be
appreciated! Please do as soon as possible.
Thanks!
Antoin and Jim
On 23 Apr 2016, at 10:52, James Galvin wrote:
At our last meeting Gustavo gave a presentation about this RDAP
extension and asked for the working group to consider adopting it for
consideration as a standards track extension.
He had a minor update to do to the document, which he has done with
this published version.
As an RDAP extension looking for standards track this document falls
precisely within the remit of this working group.
Please indicate on the list if you support or object to the adoption
of this document by Saturday, 30 April.
If you object please indicate why you object.
If you support the document please indicate if you have a preference
for how soon the working group progresses the document: now, soon, or
later.
If there are no objections the document will be adopted by the
working group.
Thanks,
Antoin and Jim
co-chairs regext
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
