Hello colleagues,
 
The gTLD base registry agreement requires Registries to provide and update
the relevant documentation of all the EPP Objects and Extensions supported
to ICANN prior to deployment. Currently, in order to comply with this
provision, Registries upload their documentation through a portal maintained
by ICANN.
 
The proposal for the new version of this portal is to periodically download
the EPP extensions registry
(http://www.iana.org/assignments/epp-extensions/epp-extensions.xhtml
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/epp-extensions/epp-extensions.xhtml> )
allowing the registry to select entries from the IANA Registry. In other
words, the EPP extension must be registered in the IANA EPP Registry in
order to comply with this contractual provision.
 
Several Registries have implemented EPP extensions described in WG I-Ds that
are not registered in the IANA EPP registry. Is it appropriate to register a
*WG* I-D in the IANA EPP Registry or should the author wait until the I-D
becomes an RFC? Should it be a requirement to register the EPP extension in
the IANA EPP registry shortly after becoming a WG item?
 
Thank you for your feedback.
 
Regards,
Gustavo


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to