It sounds like you’re attempting to morph RDDS into the SRS.  RDDS is a lookup 
service and the SRS is an OLTP system.  A lookup service either has the data or 
it doesn’t.  Extra business logic associated with availability (variant 
blocking, relationship blocking, reserved domains, etc.) should be left to the 
appropriate channel which is the SRS and not RDDS. 

-- 
 
JG
 
James F. Gould
Distinguished Engineer
Verisign
[email protected]
 
 

On 12/7/16, 10:12 AM, "regext on behalf of Andrew Sullivan" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

    On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:56:11AM -0500, John R Levine wrote:
    > I was thinking that you're the RDAP server for .FOO and someone who's
    > screwed up his bootstrap asks about BLAH.BAR, with whom you have no
    > connection.
    
    I will just point out that this is the _exact_ reason some of us
    thought the bootstrap mechanism should have been SRV records in the
    DNS, because it would have neatly solved that exact problem.  
    
    > I suppose we could pick another code for "it's not assigned but if you pay
    > me money it could be" but I really don't think it's a good idea to read
    > anything beyond "I don't know" into a normal 404 response.
    
    I agree with this in principle, but given the way humans actually use
    the RDDS, there's going to need to be _some_ way to communicate this
    difference.  In particular, for policy reasons it's important to
    understand "this domain isn't available because someone has it", "this
    domain isn't available because someone has something that prevents it
    being registered", and "this domain isn't available to anyone for
    policy reasons."  Consider people doing compliance checks, who maybe
    shouldn't have access to the SRS directly and who should only have
    access to the RDDS.  They still need to be able to see these
    distinctions.
    
    A
    
    -- 
    Andrew Sullivan
    [email protected]
    
    _______________________________________________
    regext mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
    

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to