On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 03:16:01PM -0200, Rubens Kuhl wrote: > > Unintuitive as it is, that was exactly the output of the ICANN EWG on RDDS.
Perhaps fortunately, the EWG's output doesn't determine ICANN policy on this. Because the centralised RDS that they were proposing was, IMO, very close to the worst scaling plan I've heard on the Internet in a very long time. > We can do that using a local WHOIS port-43 attender Really? Are we still talking about keeping that miserable obsolete nightmare around even longer? Port 43 must die. A -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
