On 14/08/2017 19:27, Gould, James wrote: > As a co-author of Launch Phase Mapping going back 5 years and the one that > added the “Domain names may be made available only in unique launch phases, > whilst remaining unavailable for concurrent launch phases” language to the > draft, I’m aware of the intent. Wil and Gavin can also weigh in on the > intent. The intent was for the launch phases to be associated with the TLD > (or zone), where there may be a policy for launch phases that differentiates > the availability of domain names. It was never intended or foreseen that a > launch phase would be used to group a set of domain names as a form of fee > classification. We can agree to disagree on this topic.
I agree with Jim. The Launch Phase was not designed to deal with premium names: I would not have created the fee extension if it were. G. -- Gavin Brown Chief Technology Officer CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC) Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries https://www.centralnic.com/ CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 8576358. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6AR.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
