Jody, Would that also apply to the use of the extension to signal the DNS operator ?
Rubens > Em 15 de set de 2017, à(s) 18:05:000, Jody Kolker <[email protected]> > escreveu: > > Hi Jim, > > We do not have any intention at this time of implementing this draft. We > have no desire to send reseller information to the registry due to > competition concerns. We believe there is no reason for the registry to > require this suite of information. > > Thanks, > Jody Kolker > > From: regext [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gould, James > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 9:14 AM > To: James Galvin <[email protected]>; Linlin Zhou <[email protected]> > Cc: regext <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension > > Jim, > > There is one additional potential use is for providing registrar information > in support of transfers. We have a proprietary Whois Info Extension > (https://www.verisign.com/assets/epp-sdk/verisign_epp-extension_whois-info_v00.html > > <https://www.verisign.com/assets/epp-sdk/verisign_epp-extension_whois-info_v00.html>) > that extends the domain info command and response to include the sponsoring > registrar’s name, whois server, and URL to enable registrars to get this > information without having to go to Whois. The Whois Info Extension was > created based on registrar feedback. Providing the information from the > organization extension would serve the same purpose. I view providing the > registrar information via the organization mapping and extension as > potentially providing immediate value. Would registrars see value in this? > > > > — > > JG > > <image001.png> > > James Gould > Distinguished Engineer > [email protected] <x-msg://29/[email protected]> > > 703-948-3271 > 12061 Bluemont Way > Reston, VA 20190 > > Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/> > > From: regext <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on > behalf of James Galvin <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Friday, August 25, 2017 at 9:47 AM > To: Linlin Zhou <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: regext <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] implementation status of organization > extension > > At least two potential uses of these drafts have been identified by this > group: for resellers and for DNS operators. > > It would be very helpful if folks from those communities would make a point > of reviewing these documents and consider supporting them or at least > indicating you have no objection. > > Of course, if you have any implementation notes, real or planned, that would > be even better. > > Thanks, > > Jim > > > > On 21 Aug 2017, at 22:03, Linlin Zhou wrote: > > Dear all, > To support WG's suggestion, the organization extension drafts plan to add a > section on implementation status. If you have already implemented > organization extention, know of any existing implementations or planned > implementations, please send me a mail for us to update the drafts. Any > reviews or comments will be appreciated. > > Regards, > Linlin Zhou > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>_______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
