Isn't the sponsoring registrar already available in the clID field of the 
object ?


Rubens


> On Sep 18, 2017, at 9:08 AM, Gould, James <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Jody,
> 
> You don’t have any use for retrieving the sponsoring registrar information 
> via EPP in the support of transfers?  A registrar could certainly go out to 
> Whois to obtain the registrar information, but I believe that retrieving the 
> information over EPP is a better solution.
> 
> —
> 
> JG
> 
> <image001.png>
> 
> James Gould
> Distinguished Engineer
> [email protected] <x-msg://3/[email protected]>
> 
> 703-948-3271
> 12061 Bluemont Way
> Reston, VA 20190
> 
> Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/>
> 
> From: Jody Kolker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Friday, September 15, 2017 at 5:05 PM
> To: James Gould <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, James 
> Galvin <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, Linlin Zhou 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Cc: regext <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [regext] implementation status of organization 
> extension
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> We do not have any intention at this time of implementing this draft.  We 
> have no desire to send reseller information to the registry due to 
> competition concerns.  We believe there is no reason for the registry to 
> require this suite of information.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jody Kolker
> 
> From: regext [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Gould, James
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 9:14 AM
> To: James Galvin <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; Linlin Zhou 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Cc: regext <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension
> 
> Jim,
> 
> There is one additional potential use is for providing registrar information 
> in support of transfers.  We have a proprietary Whois Info Extension 
> (https://www.verisign.com/assets/epp-sdk/verisign_epp-extension_whois-info_v00.html
>  
> <https://www.verisign.com/assets/epp-sdk/verisign_epp-extension_whois-info_v00.html>)
>  that extends the domain info command and response to include the sponsoring 
> registrar’s name, whois server, and URL to enable registrars to get this 
> information without having to go to Whois.  The Whois Info Extension was 
> created based on registrar feedback.  Providing the information from the 
> organization extension would serve the same purpose.  I view providing the 
> registrar information via the organization mapping and extension as 
> potentially providing immediate value.  Would registrars see value in this?
> 
> 
> —
> 
> JG
> 
> <image002.png>
> 
> James Gould
> Distinguished Engineer
> [email protected] <x-msg://3/[email protected]>
> 
> 703-948-3271
> 12061 Bluemont Way
> Reston, VA 20190
> 
> Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/>
> 
> From: regext <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on 
> behalf of James Galvin <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Friday, August 25, 2017 at 9:47 AM
> To: Linlin Zhou <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Cc: regext <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] implementation status of organization 
> extension
> 
> At least two potential uses of these drafts have been identified by this 
> group: for resellers and for DNS operators.
> 
> It would be very helpful if folks from those communities would make a point 
> of reviewing these documents and consider supporting them or at least 
> indicating you have no objection.
> 
> Of course, if you have any implementation notes, real or planned, that would 
> be even better.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> 
> On 21 Aug 2017, at 22:03, Linlin Zhou wrote:
> 
>> Dear all,
>> To support WG's suggestion, the organization extension drafts plan to add a 
>> section on implementation status. If you have already implemented 
>> organization extention, know of any existing implementations or planned 
>> implementations, please send me a mail for us to update the drafts. Any 
>> reviews or comments will be appreciated.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Linlin Zhou
>> _______________________________________________
>> regext mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext 
>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>_______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to