Ok that's helped it clarify things in my mind. So your desire is to have an epp mapping for dname so that the verisign registry for the root zone can accept such records? I suppose that's up to the root zone maintainers and there's no harm in creating the mapping or an extension. But the use case for name registries would be very narrow and potentially worse for the registrant and certainly in breach of current gTLD requirements for zone contents.
Kal Feher On 13/11/17, 10:02, "'Stephane Bortzmeyer'" <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote: >On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 01:52:26AM +0000, > Feher, Kal <Kalman.Feher@team.neustar> wrote > a message of 71 lines which said: > >> Why wouldnt we have DNAME at the apex of the registered name? Ie >> controlled by the domain owner. > >It would force the domain holder to have nameservers configured for >this name. It is always a hassle but, in the case of RFC 7535, it is >simply not possible. > >> I may be missing something of the use case here. > >My personal use case was RFC 7535 + draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal. _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
