Dear all, We have requested a 2 hour work session, and a 1 hour working group meeting slot.
Roger: Excelent topics, but we need somebody to lead the discussion. We assume you can lead the Registry Mapping discussion during the work session? How about the Poll Messages w/ Unhandled Namespaces? - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 25 mei 2018, om 17:25 heeft Roger D Carney <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > Good Morning, > > Do we need to discuss our next documents in our regular meeting slot? > > For the regular meeting, I would like to give an update from the interim > meeting(s). > > I like the two suggested topics for the working session: Registry Mapping and > Poll Messages w/ Unhandled Namespaces > > With all the focus from ICANN on RDAP, I wonder if we should also discuss > what is left to make RDAP functional for ICANN (e.g. authentication methods, > searching, etc.). > > I think maybe an hour for each session. Again I would like to see the working > session before the regular meeting so that we can provide updates at the > regular meeting. > > > Thanks > Roger > > > -----Original Message----- > From: regext [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 1:25 AM > To: regext <[email protected]> > Subject: [regext] Preparing for Montreal > > Hi all, > > It is time for us to start thinking of meeting in Montreal. > With 6 out of 9 millstones on our list in a shepherd writeup status, the > chairs would like to know if there are enough topics left for us to justify a > work session in Montreal and get a sense of the length for our regular > meeting slot. > We need to send in a meeting request next week, so our question to you is: > -Do you have agenda items for Montreal? > -Do you have items to be discussed in a work session? > > Our judgement is that we have 3 active drafts left on our milestones list for > which there is little discussion left, mostly also because the focus has been > on the 6 WGLC documents for the past period and we have little resources (in > other words: we understand you could do with a re-bootstrapping ;-)). > There are 2 topics that may justify a work session as far as we are aware: > -The registry mapping discussion > -Poll messages with unhanded namespaces > But since there are no related drafts yet for these discussions that need to > be presented in our regular session, we could also decide to use 1 meeting > slot where we take the first half hour for our regular session for status > updates to our milestones, and the rest of our meeting to these topics if > someone is willing to lead them. > > So please let us know if you have any agenda items. > > Jim and Antoin. > > - -- > Antoin Verschuren > > Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL > M: +31 6 37682392 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
