Antoin, I can lead the second work session.
Jim Sent from my iPhone On Jun 1, 2018, at 8:55 AM, Antoin Verschuren <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear all, We have requested a 2 hour work session, and a 1 hour working group meeting slot. Roger: Excelent topics, but we need somebody to lead the discussion. We assume you can lead the Registry Mapping discussion during the work session? How about the Poll Messages w/ Unhandled Namespaces? - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 25 mei 2018, om 17:25 heeft Roger D Carney <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> het volgende geschreven: Good Morning, Do we need to discuss our next documents in our regular meeting slot? For the regular meeting, I would like to give an update from the interim meeting(s). I like the two suggested topics for the working session: Registry Mapping and Poll Messages w/ Unhandled Namespaces With all the focus from ICANN on RDAP, I wonder if we should also discuss what is left to make RDAP functional for ICANN (e.g. authentication methods, searching, etc.). I think maybe an hour for each session. Again I would like to see the working session before the regular meeting so that we can provide updates at the regular meeting. Thanks Roger -----Original Message----- From: regext [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 1:25 AM To: regext <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [regext] Preparing for Montreal Hi all, It is time for us to start thinking of meeting in Montreal. With 6 out of 9 millstones on our list in a shepherd writeup status, the chairs would like to know if there are enough topics left for us to justify a work session in Montreal and get a sense of the length for our regular meeting slot. We need to send in a meeting request next week, so our question to you is: -Do you have agenda items for Montreal? -Do you have items to be discussed in a work session? Our judgement is that we have 3 active drafts left on our milestones list for which there is little discussion left, mostly also because the focus has been on the 6 WGLC documents for the past period and we have little resources (in other words: we understand you could do with a re-bootstrapping ;-)). There are 2 topics that may justify a work session as far as we are aware: -The registry mapping discussion -Poll messages with unhanded namespaces But since there are no related drafts yet for these discussions that need to be presented in our regular session, we could also decide to use 1 meeting slot where we take the first half hour for our regular session for status updates to our milestones, and the rest of our meeting to these topics if someone is willing to lead them. So please let us know if you have any agenda items. Jim and Antoin. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
