> -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Roach <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2018 2:37 PM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]>; Hollenbeck, Scott > <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; 'draft- > [email protected]' <draft-ietf-regext-rdap- > [email protected]> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object- > tag > > On 6/6/18 06:56, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Adam Roach <[email protected]> > .... > >>>> I read the text as calling for implementors to concatenate "XXXX- > YYYY" > >>>> to the > >>>> end of the IANA-registered base URL ("https://example.com/rdap/";), > >>>> resulting in "https://example.com/rdap/XXXX-YYYY";. The example > >>>> instead shows "https://example.com/rdap/entity/XXXX-YYY";. Is the > >>>> inclusion of "entity/" in this example an error? > >>> No, it's not an error. That’s the path segment that 7482 describes > >>> for > >> entity queries. I can see how my text above might be confusing, > >> though, so how about this wording instead? > >>> OLD: > >>> "The base RDAP URL is concatenated to the entity handle to create a > >> complete RDAP query path segment of > >> "https://example.com/rdap/entity/XXXX- > >> YYYY"" > >>> NEW: > >>> "The RDAP query URL is formed using the base RDAP URL and entity > >>> path > >> segment described in Section 3.1.5 of RFC 7482, using "XXXX-YYY" as > >> the value of the handle identifier. The complete RDAP query URL > >> becomes "https://example.com/rdap/entity/XXXX-YYYY"."; > >> > >> That seems good. > >> > >> Thanks for the explanations. Based on what you've said, I think this > >> is ready for IETF last call -- you can treat my comment for > >> clarification of the example as an IETF last call comment, and > >> address it along with any other feedback you receive during last call. > > Will do - thanks! > > IETF Last Call has concluded, and I didn't see any other comments that > would necessitate changes in the document. Just to make sure we're on the > same page, I'm waiting on a -04 version of the document reflecting the > above change prior to asking for the IESG to ballot on the document. > Let me know if that's not what you expect.
Thanks. Yes, I'll update it in the next day or so. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
