Folks, during the IETF meeting we talked a little bit about the possibility of re-doing the RDAP protocol specs to address clarifications and errata identified as a result of implementation experience. We didn't have a lot of time to talk through the possibilities, so I thought I'd start something here.
We spoke a bit in the room about the possibility of re-spinning the documents as Proposed Standard RFCs. However, as long as we stick to fixing errata, dealing with clarifications, etc., and not adding new features, we could make a case for document updates with the goal of producing Draft Standard RFCs. I believe we have enough implementation experience to meet the requirements for publication as Draft Standards (see Section 4.1.2 of RFC 2026), so let me throw that out there. Should we take on the update process with a goal of producing Draft Standards, or do we need to make more substantial changes that require a Proposed Standard re-do? Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
