Hi Scott, Forgive my ignorance, but what's the difference between a Draft Standard and a Proposed Standard?
+1 either way! G. > On 1 Aug 2019, at 17:23, Hollenbeck, Scott > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Folks, during the IETF meeting we talked a little bit about the possibility > of re-doing the RDAP protocol specs to address clarifications and errata > identified as a result of implementation experience. We didn't have a lot of > time to talk through the possibilities, so I thought I'd start something here. > > We spoke a bit in the room about the possibility of re-spinning the documents > as Proposed Standard RFCs. However, as long as we stick to fixing errata, > dealing with clarifications, etc., and not adding new features, we could make > a case for document updates with the goal of producing Draft Standard RFCs. I > believe we have enough implementation experience to meet the requirements for > publication as Draft Standards (see Section 4.1.2 of RFC 2026), so let me > throw that out there. Should we take on the update process with a goal of > producing Draft Standards, or do we need to make more substantial changes > that require a Proposed Standard re-do? > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext -- Gavin Brown Chief Innovation Officer CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC) https://www.centralnicgroup.com/ +44.7548243029 CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 8576358. Registered Offices: Saddlers House, Gutter Lane, London EC2V 6AE. _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
